Automated Journalism: A Meta-Analysis of Readers’ Perceptions of Human-Written in Comparison to Automated News
This meta-analysis summarizes evidence on how readers perceive the credibility, quality, and readability of automated news in comparison to human-written news. Overall, the results, which are based on experimental and descriptive evidence from 12 studies with a total of 4,473 participants, showed no...
Main Authors: | Andreas Graefe, Nina Bohlken |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Media and Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3019 |
Similar Items
-
Automated Journalism as a Source of and a Diagnostic Device for Bias in Reporting
by: Leo Leppänen, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Assistance or Resistance? Evaluating the Intersection of Automated Journalism and Journalistic Role Conceptions
by: Aljosha Karim Schapals, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Automation in Sports Reporting: Strategies of Data Providers, Software Providers, and Media Outlets
by: Jessica Kunert
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Judging the Credibility and Professionalism of Citizen Journalism Versus Professional Journalism
by: Hood, Caroline Christiansen
Published: (2011) -
News Credibility and Blogs: Exploring the Effect of Blog Use on Perceptions of News Credibility
by: Duerden, Daniel Spencer
Published: (2010)