Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Good questionnaires are essential to support the early identification of children with psychosocial dysfunction in community based settings. Our aim was to assess which of three short questionnaires was most suitable for this identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoekstra Femke, Crone Matty R, Vogels Antonius GC, Reijneveld Sijmen A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-12-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/489
id doaj-a7ff2dcc91b84dffbd17bc23bb2d7adf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7ff2dcc91b84dffbd17bc23bb2d7adf2020-11-24T21:38:08ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582009-12-019148910.1186/1471-2458-9-489Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized methodHoekstra FemkeCrone Matty RVogels Antonius GCReijneveld Sijmen A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Good questionnaires are essential to support the early identification of children with psychosocial dysfunction in community based settings. Our aim was to assess which of three short questionnaires was most suitable for this identification among school-aged children</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A community-based sample of 2,066 parents of children aged 7-12 years (85% of those eligible) filled out the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and - randomly determined - one of three questionnaires to be compared: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with Impact Supplement (SDQ), the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) and the PSYBOBA, a Dutch-origin questionnaire. Preventive Child Healthcare professionals assessed children's psychosocial functioning during routine health examinations. We assessed the scale structure (by means of Structural Equation Modelling), validity (correlation coefficients, sensitivity and specificity) and usability (ratings by parents and professionals) of each questionnaire and the degree to which they could improve the identification based only on clinical assessment (logistic regression).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For the three questionnaires, Cronbach's alphas varied between 0.80 and 0.89. Sensitivities for a clinical CBCL at a cut off point with specificity = 0.90 varied between 0.78 and 0.86 for the three questionnaires. Areas under the Receiver Operating Curve, using the CBCL as criterion, varied between 0.93 and 0.96. No differences were statistically significant. All three questionnaires added information to the clinical assessment. Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for added information were PSC: 29.3 (14.4-59.8), SDQ: 55.0 (23.1-131.2) and PSYBOBA: 68.5 (28.3-165.6). Parents preferred the SDQ and PSYBOBA. Preventive Child Health Care professionals preferred the SDQ.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This randomized comparison of three questionnaires shows that each of the three questionnaires can improve the detection of psychosocial dysfunction among children substantially.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/489
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hoekstra Femke
Crone Matty R
Vogels Antonius GC
Reijneveld Sijmen A
spellingShingle Hoekstra Femke
Crone Matty R
Vogels Antonius GC
Reijneveld Sijmen A
Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
BMC Public Health
author_facet Hoekstra Femke
Crone Matty R
Vogels Antonius GC
Reijneveld Sijmen A
author_sort Hoekstra Femke
title Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
title_short Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
title_full Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
title_fullStr Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
title_full_unstemmed Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
title_sort comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: a randomized method
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2009-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Good questionnaires are essential to support the early identification of children with psychosocial dysfunction in community based settings. Our aim was to assess which of three short questionnaires was most suitable for this identification among school-aged children</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A community-based sample of 2,066 parents of children aged 7-12 years (85% of those eligible) filled out the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and - randomly determined - one of three questionnaires to be compared: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with Impact Supplement (SDQ), the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) and the PSYBOBA, a Dutch-origin questionnaire. Preventive Child Healthcare professionals assessed children's psychosocial functioning during routine health examinations. We assessed the scale structure (by means of Structural Equation Modelling), validity (correlation coefficients, sensitivity and specificity) and usability (ratings by parents and professionals) of each questionnaire and the degree to which they could improve the identification based only on clinical assessment (logistic regression).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>For the three questionnaires, Cronbach's alphas varied between 0.80 and 0.89. Sensitivities for a clinical CBCL at a cut off point with specificity = 0.90 varied between 0.78 and 0.86 for the three questionnaires. Areas under the Receiver Operating Curve, using the CBCL as criterion, varied between 0.93 and 0.96. No differences were statistically significant. All three questionnaires added information to the clinical assessment. Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for added information were PSC: 29.3 (14.4-59.8), SDQ: 55.0 (23.1-131.2) and PSYBOBA: 68.5 (28.3-165.6). Parents preferred the SDQ and PSYBOBA. Preventive Child Health Care professionals preferred the SDQ.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This randomized comparison of three questionnaires shows that each of the three questionnaires can improve the detection of psychosocial dysfunction among children substantially.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/489
work_keys_str_mv AT hoekstrafemke comparingthreeshortquestionnairestodetectpsychosocialdysfunctionamongprimaryschoolchildrenarandomizedmethod
AT cronemattyr comparingthreeshortquestionnairestodetectpsychosocialdysfunctionamongprimaryschoolchildrenarandomizedmethod
AT vogelsantoniusgc comparingthreeshortquestionnairestodetectpsychosocialdysfunctionamongprimaryschoolchildrenarandomizedmethod
AT reijneveldsijmena comparingthreeshortquestionnairestodetectpsychosocialdysfunctionamongprimaryschoolchildrenarandomizedmethod
_version_ 1725935408841228288