Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department

Introduction: Pain is a common presentation to the emergency department but often overlooked with little research done on the topic in Nepal. We did an observational retrospective study on 301 patients in the emergency ward of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences with the objective of finding the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rabin Bhandari, Gyanendra Malla, Indrajit Prasad Mahato, Pramendra Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nepal Medical Association 2013-03-01
Series:Journal of Nepal Medical Association
Online Access:http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/554
id doaj-a7f11ac70c0e49feb03ffba22cfe8197
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7f11ac70c0e49feb03ffba22cfe81972020-11-25T00:06:31ZengNepal Medical AssociationJournal of Nepal Medical Association0028-27151815-672X2013-03-0152189224228554Use of Analgesia in an Emergency DepartmentRabin Bhandari0Gyanendra Malla1Indrajit Prasad Mahato2Pramendra Gupta3Department of General Practice and Emergency, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, DharanDepartment of General Practice and Emergency, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, DharanDepartment of General Practice and Emergency, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, DharanDepartment of General Practice and Emergency, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, DharanIntroduction: Pain is a common presentation to the emergency department but often overlooked with little research done on the topic in Nepal. We did an observational retrospective study on 301 patients in the emergency ward of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences with the objective of finding the practice of analgesia. The specific focus was on the time to analgesia, drugs for analgesia and method of pain assessment. 
 Methods: Case file analysis of patients discharged home after presenting with pain was performed. Time to analgesia and other factors were analyzed with descriptive statistics. 
 Results: Diclofenac injection intramuscular (80%) was the commonest analgesic used. Assessment methods and record keeping were poor. Pain in the abdomen was the commonest. The median time to analgesia from triage was 45 minutes (IQR 30 to 80) and the median time to analgesia from doctor evaluation was 40 minutes (IQR 20 to 70). 
 Conclusions: Time to analgesia from triage and doctors assessment in our set up is comparable to others. The quality of documentation is poor. Problems with pain identification and assessment may lead to inadequate analgesia so reinforcing the use of pain descriptor at triage itself with pain score would be helpful in adopting a protocol based management of pain. 
 Keywords: analgesia; emergency; Nepal. 
http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/554
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rabin Bhandari
Gyanendra Malla
Indrajit Prasad Mahato
Pramendra Gupta
spellingShingle Rabin Bhandari
Gyanendra Malla
Indrajit Prasad Mahato
Pramendra Gupta
Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department
Journal of Nepal Medical Association
author_facet Rabin Bhandari
Gyanendra Malla
Indrajit Prasad Mahato
Pramendra Gupta
author_sort Rabin Bhandari
title Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department
title_short Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department
title_full Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department
title_fullStr Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed Use of Analgesia in an Emergency Department
title_sort use of analgesia in an emergency department
publisher Nepal Medical Association
series Journal of Nepal Medical Association
issn 0028-2715
1815-672X
publishDate 2013-03-01
description Introduction: Pain is a common presentation to the emergency department but often overlooked with little research done on the topic in Nepal. We did an observational retrospective study on 301 patients in the emergency ward of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences with the objective of finding the practice of analgesia. The specific focus was on the time to analgesia, drugs for analgesia and method of pain assessment. 
 Methods: Case file analysis of patients discharged home after presenting with pain was performed. Time to analgesia and other factors were analyzed with descriptive statistics. 
 Results: Diclofenac injection intramuscular (80%) was the commonest analgesic used. Assessment methods and record keeping were poor. Pain in the abdomen was the commonest. The median time to analgesia from triage was 45 minutes (IQR 30 to 80) and the median time to analgesia from doctor evaluation was 40 minutes (IQR 20 to 70). 
 Conclusions: Time to analgesia from triage and doctors assessment in our set up is comparable to others. The quality of documentation is poor. Problems with pain identification and assessment may lead to inadequate analgesia so reinforcing the use of pain descriptor at triage itself with pain score would be helpful in adopting a protocol based management of pain. 
 Keywords: analgesia; emergency; Nepal. 
url http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/554
work_keys_str_mv AT rabinbhandari useofanalgesiainanemergencydepartment
AT gyanendramalla useofanalgesiainanemergencydepartment
AT indrajitprasadmahato useofanalgesiainanemergencydepartment
AT pramendragupta useofanalgesiainanemergencydepartment
_version_ 1725421737676374016