Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness

Objective. This study examined the use of psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance, two key concepts of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), in the psychological recovery process of people with enduring mental illness. Method. Sixty-seven participants were recruited from the metropoli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vinicius R. Siqueira, Lindsay G. Oades
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Psychiatry Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968596
id doaj-a7e47981f7e94ef0a7f42c93d5220f7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7e47981f7e94ef0a7f42c93d5220f7b2020-11-24T20:59:01ZengHindawi LimitedPsychiatry Journal2314-43272314-43352015-01-01201510.1155/2015/968596968596Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental IllnessVinicius R. Siqueira0Lindsay G. Oades1School of Psychology, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, Illawarra Institute for Mental Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, AustraliaObjective. This study examined the use of psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance, two key concepts of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), in the psychological recovery process of people with enduring mental illness. Method. Sixty-seven participants were recruited from the metropolitan, regional, and rural areas of New South Wales, Australia. They all presented some form of chronic mental illness (at least 12 months) as reflected in DSM-IV Axis I diagnostic criteria. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-19) was used to measure the presence of psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance; the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) was used to examine the levels of psychological recovery; and the Scales of Psychological Well-Being was used to observe if there are benefits in utilizing psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance in the recovery process. Results. An analysis of objectively quantifiable measures found no clear correlation between the use of psychological acceptance and recovery in mental illness as measured by the RAS. The data, however, showed a relationship between psychological acceptance and some components of recovery, thereby demonstrating its possible value in the recovery process. Conclusion. The major contribution of this research was the emerging correlation that was observed between psychological acceptance and positive levels of psychological well-being among individuals with mental illness.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968596
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vinicius R. Siqueira
Lindsay G. Oades
spellingShingle Vinicius R. Siqueira
Lindsay G. Oades
Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness
Psychiatry Journal
author_facet Vinicius R. Siqueira
Lindsay G. Oades
author_sort Vinicius R. Siqueira
title Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness
title_short Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness
title_full Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness
title_fullStr Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance and Avoidance Processes at Different Levels of Psychological Recovery from Enduring Mental Illness
title_sort acceptance and avoidance processes at different levels of psychological recovery from enduring mental illness
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Psychiatry Journal
issn 2314-4327
2314-4335
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objective. This study examined the use of psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance, two key concepts of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), in the psychological recovery process of people with enduring mental illness. Method. Sixty-seven participants were recruited from the metropolitan, regional, and rural areas of New South Wales, Australia. They all presented some form of chronic mental illness (at least 12 months) as reflected in DSM-IV Axis I diagnostic criteria. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-19) was used to measure the presence of psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance; the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) was used to examine the levels of psychological recovery; and the Scales of Psychological Well-Being was used to observe if there are benefits in utilizing psychological acceptance and experiential avoidance in the recovery process. Results. An analysis of objectively quantifiable measures found no clear correlation between the use of psychological acceptance and recovery in mental illness as measured by the RAS. The data, however, showed a relationship between psychological acceptance and some components of recovery, thereby demonstrating its possible value in the recovery process. Conclusion. The major contribution of this research was the emerging correlation that was observed between psychological acceptance and positive levels of psychological well-being among individuals with mental illness.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/968596
work_keys_str_mv AT viniciusrsiqueira acceptanceandavoidanceprocessesatdifferentlevelsofpsychologicalrecoveryfromenduringmentalillness
AT lindsaygoades acceptanceandavoidanceprocessesatdifferentlevelsofpsychologicalrecoveryfromenduringmentalillness
_version_ 1716784152807735296