Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale

The purpose of this research was to validate the assessing interest in STEM content scale. The sample in this research was 552 students in upper secondary school at Fangchanupathum School, Chiang Mai, Thailand, who validated the assessing interest in STEM content scale, which used a rating scale of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanit Srikoon, Ronnachit Apaivatin, Piyapong Monsang, Sujinta Khamngoen, Thararat Malaitao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1696494
id doaj-a7e289a9d8d245a3af90780026a6071a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7e289a9d8d245a3af90780026a6071a2020-11-25T03:52:50ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102020-01-01202010.1155/2020/16964941696494Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content ScaleSanit Srikoon0Ronnachit Apaivatin1Piyapong Monsang2Sujinta Khamngoen3Thararat Malaitao4Department of Curriculum and Instruction, School of Education, Mae Ka, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, ThailandDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, School of Education, Mae Ka, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, ThailandDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, School of Education, Mae Ka, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, ThailandDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, School of Education, Mae Ka, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, ThailandDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, School of Education, Mae Ka, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, ThailandThe purpose of this research was to validate the assessing interest in STEM content scale. The sample in this research was 552 students in upper secondary school at Fangchanupathum School, Chiang Mai, Thailand, who validated the assessing interest in STEM content scale, which used a rating scale of four factors consisting of (1) science, (2) mathematics, (3) laboratorial skills, and (4) technology and 20 items. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the construct validity of the assessing interest in STEM content scale adapted from the study by Tyler-Wood, Knezek, and Christensen. The results confirmed that the construct validity of this assessing interest in STEM content scale had an excellent fit. They showed that the fitness index of validating the assessing interest in STEM content scale was X2 statistic of 163.679 (degree of freedom = 141, P value = 0.0928) and the X2/df ratio having a value of 1.160 indicating a good fit. The comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.991, and Tucker–Lewis coefficient (TLI) was 0.988. The root mean square error approximation (RMSEA) was 0.017. The standardized root mean residual (SRMR) was 0.047. All the indicators indicated that there was a good fit between the empirical data and the hypothetical measurement model.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1696494
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sanit Srikoon
Ronnachit Apaivatin
Piyapong Monsang
Sujinta Khamngoen
Thararat Malaitao
spellingShingle Sanit Srikoon
Ronnachit Apaivatin
Piyapong Monsang
Sujinta Khamngoen
Thararat Malaitao
Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale
Education Research International
author_facet Sanit Srikoon
Ronnachit Apaivatin
Piyapong Monsang
Sujinta Khamngoen
Thararat Malaitao
author_sort Sanit Srikoon
title Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale
title_short Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale
title_full Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale
title_fullStr Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale
title_full_unstemmed Construct Validity of Assessing Interest in STEM Content Scale
title_sort construct validity of assessing interest in stem content scale
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The purpose of this research was to validate the assessing interest in STEM content scale. The sample in this research was 552 students in upper secondary school at Fangchanupathum School, Chiang Mai, Thailand, who validated the assessing interest in STEM content scale, which used a rating scale of four factors consisting of (1) science, (2) mathematics, (3) laboratorial skills, and (4) technology and 20 items. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to confirm the construct validity of the assessing interest in STEM content scale adapted from the study by Tyler-Wood, Knezek, and Christensen. The results confirmed that the construct validity of this assessing interest in STEM content scale had an excellent fit. They showed that the fitness index of validating the assessing interest in STEM content scale was X2 statistic of 163.679 (degree of freedom = 141, P value = 0.0928) and the X2/df ratio having a value of 1.160 indicating a good fit. The comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.991, and Tucker–Lewis coefficient (TLI) was 0.988. The root mean square error approximation (RMSEA) was 0.017. The standardized root mean residual (SRMR) was 0.047. All the indicators indicated that there was a good fit between the empirical data and the hypothetical measurement model.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1696494
work_keys_str_mv AT sanitsrikoon constructvalidityofassessinginterestinstemcontentscale
AT ronnachitapaivatin constructvalidityofassessinginterestinstemcontentscale
AT piyapongmonsang constructvalidityofassessinginterestinstemcontentscale
AT sujintakhamngoen constructvalidityofassessinginterestinstemcontentscale
AT thararatmalaitao constructvalidityofassessinginterestinstemcontentscale
_version_ 1715096522926850048