A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to measure the blood pressure of University students and relate variation to specific risk factors (age, sex, family history of hypertension, body mass index and smoking). Patients & Methods: This study is a cross sectional study based on a random sam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul-Hussein F. Ghadhban, Omran S Habib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Basrah 2011-12-01
Series:The Medical Journal of Basrah University
Online Access:https://mjbu.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_49482_d955917244fc61b8385f14dd8e2abac7.pdf
id doaj-a7df62e2534a40caadee284209e3654f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7df62e2534a40caadee284209e3654f2020-11-25T03:10:00ZengUniversity of BasrahThe Medical Journal of Basrah University 0253-07592413-44142011-12-01291435010.33762/mjbu.2011.4948249482A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTSAbdul-Hussein F. GhadhbanOmran S HabibABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to measure the blood pressure of University students and relate variation to specific risk factors (age, sex, family history of hypertension, body mass index and smoking). Patients & Methods: This study is a cross sectional study based on a random sample drawn from 5 of the 14 colleges in the University of Basrah. Field part of the study extended from first of March to middle of May 2010 and involved 330 students. Results: The results showed that with respect to systolic blood pressure, 17% were in the prehypertension and 1.8% hypertensive. For diastolic blood pressure, 31.8% were in the prehypertension and 3.6% hypertensive. Using multiple logistic regression analysis sex, family history and body mass index predict significantly 9% of the systolic pressure measurements variability. Also body mass index, sex and family history of hypertension could significantly predict 10% of variability. Also body mass index, sex and family history of hypertension could variability predict 10% of variability. Other variables (age, smoking and father education) could not predict significant variability of blood pressure measurements. Conclusions: Monitoring blood pressure in young adults is worth doing as a high percent of students were either hypertensive or in the prehypertension stage.https://mjbu.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_49482_d955917244fc61b8385f14dd8e2abac7.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdul-Hussein F. Ghadhban
Omran S Habib
spellingShingle Abdul-Hussein F. Ghadhban
Omran S Habib
A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
The Medical Journal of Basrah University
author_facet Abdul-Hussein F. Ghadhban
Omran S Habib
author_sort Abdul-Hussein F. Ghadhban
title A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_short A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_full A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_fullStr A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_full_unstemmed A STUDY ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
title_sort study on the distribution of blood pressure measurements among university students
publisher University of Basrah
series The Medical Journal of Basrah University
issn 0253-0759
2413-4414
publishDate 2011-12-01
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study was to measure the blood pressure of University students and relate variation to specific risk factors (age, sex, family history of hypertension, body mass index and smoking). Patients & Methods: This study is a cross sectional study based on a random sample drawn from 5 of the 14 colleges in the University of Basrah. Field part of the study extended from first of March to middle of May 2010 and involved 330 students. Results: The results showed that with respect to systolic blood pressure, 17% were in the prehypertension and 1.8% hypertensive. For diastolic blood pressure, 31.8% were in the prehypertension and 3.6% hypertensive. Using multiple logistic regression analysis sex, family history and body mass index predict significantly 9% of the systolic pressure measurements variability. Also body mass index, sex and family history of hypertension could significantly predict 10% of variability. Also body mass index, sex and family history of hypertension could variability predict 10% of variability. Other variables (age, smoking and father education) could not predict significant variability of blood pressure measurements. Conclusions: Monitoring blood pressure in young adults is worth doing as a high percent of students were either hypertensive or in the prehypertension stage.
url https://mjbu.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_49482_d955917244fc61b8385f14dd8e2abac7.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulhusseinfghadhban astudyonthedistributionofbloodpressuremeasurementsamonguniversitystudents
AT omranshabib astudyonthedistributionofbloodpressuremeasurementsamonguniversitystudents
AT abdulhusseinfghadhban studyonthedistributionofbloodpressuremeasurementsamonguniversitystudents
AT omranshabib studyonthedistributionofbloodpressuremeasurementsamonguniversitystudents
_version_ 1724661230359019520