Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings

Purpose: As graduate medical education (GME) moves into the Next Accreditation System (NAS), programs must take a critical look at their current models of evaluation and assess how well they align with reporting outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact on house staff evaluation scores when t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karen A. Friedman, Sandy Balwan, Frank Cacace, Kyle Katona, Suzanne Sunday, Saima Chaudhry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2014-11-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/download/25185/pdf_1
id doaj-a7da9ef553324981a03b87bd9f5a89ac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7da9ef553324981a03b87bd9f5a89ac2020-11-25T02:53:09ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812014-11-011901810.3402/meo.v19.2518525185Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findingsKaren A. Friedman0Sandy Balwan1Frank Cacace2Kyle Katona3Suzanne Sunday4Saima Chaudhry5 Department of Internal Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, NY, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, NY, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, NY, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, NY, USA Department of Psychiatry, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, NY, USA Department of Internal Medicine, Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, NY, USAPurpose: As graduate medical education (GME) moves into the Next Accreditation System (NAS), programs must take a critical look at their current models of evaluation and assess how well they align with reporting outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact on house staff evaluation scores when transitioning from a Dreyfus-based model of evaluation to a Milestone-based model of evaluation. Milestones are a key component of the NAS. Method: We analyzed all end of rotation evaluations of house staff completed by faculty for academic years 2010–2011 (pre-Dreyfus model) and 2011–2012 (post-Milestone model) in one large university-based internal medicine residency training program. Main measures included change in PGY-level average score; slope, range, and separation of average scores across all six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. Results: Transitioning from a Dreyfus-based model to a Milestone-based model resulted in a larger separation in the scores between our three post-graduate year classes, a steeper progression of scores in the PGY-1 class, a wider use of the 5-point scale on our global end of rotation evaluation form, and a downward shift in the PGY-1 scores and an upward shift in the PGY-3 scores. Conclusions: For faculty trained in both models of assessment, the Milestone-based model had greater discriminatory ability as evidenced by the larger separation in the scores for all the classes, in particular the PGY-1 class.http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/download/25185/pdf_1Medical Education-GraduateMedical Education-assessment methodsMilestonesNext Accreditation SystemACGME core competencies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen A. Friedman
Sandy Balwan
Frank Cacace
Kyle Katona
Suzanne Sunday
Saima Chaudhry
spellingShingle Karen A. Friedman
Sandy Balwan
Frank Cacace
Kyle Katona
Suzanne Sunday
Saima Chaudhry
Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
Medical Education Online
Medical Education-Graduate
Medical Education-assessment methods
Milestones
Next Accreditation System
ACGME core competencies
author_facet Karen A. Friedman
Sandy Balwan
Frank Cacace
Kyle Katona
Suzanne Sunday
Saima Chaudhry
author_sort Karen A. Friedman
title Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
title_short Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
title_full Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
title_fullStr Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
title_full_unstemmed Impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a Dreyfus- to a Milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
title_sort impact on house staff evaluation scores when changing from a dreyfus- to a milestone-based evaluation model: one internal medicine residency program's findings
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Medical Education Online
issn 1087-2981
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Purpose: As graduate medical education (GME) moves into the Next Accreditation System (NAS), programs must take a critical look at their current models of evaluation and assess how well they align with reporting outcomes. Our objective was to assess the impact on house staff evaluation scores when transitioning from a Dreyfus-based model of evaluation to a Milestone-based model of evaluation. Milestones are a key component of the NAS. Method: We analyzed all end of rotation evaluations of house staff completed by faculty for academic years 2010–2011 (pre-Dreyfus model) and 2011–2012 (post-Milestone model) in one large university-based internal medicine residency training program. Main measures included change in PGY-level average score; slope, range, and separation of average scores across all six Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. Results: Transitioning from a Dreyfus-based model to a Milestone-based model resulted in a larger separation in the scores between our three post-graduate year classes, a steeper progression of scores in the PGY-1 class, a wider use of the 5-point scale on our global end of rotation evaluation form, and a downward shift in the PGY-1 scores and an upward shift in the PGY-3 scores. Conclusions: For faculty trained in both models of assessment, the Milestone-based model had greater discriminatory ability as evidenced by the larger separation in the scores for all the classes, in particular the PGY-1 class.
topic Medical Education-Graduate
Medical Education-assessment methods
Milestones
Next Accreditation System
ACGME core competencies
url http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/download/25185/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT karenafriedman impactonhousestaffevaluationscoreswhenchangingfromadreyfustoamilestonebasedevaluationmodeloneinternalmedicineresidencyprogramsfindings
AT sandybalwan impactonhousestaffevaluationscoreswhenchangingfromadreyfustoamilestonebasedevaluationmodeloneinternalmedicineresidencyprogramsfindings
AT frankcacace impactonhousestaffevaluationscoreswhenchangingfromadreyfustoamilestonebasedevaluationmodeloneinternalmedicineresidencyprogramsfindings
AT kylekatona impactonhousestaffevaluationscoreswhenchangingfromadreyfustoamilestonebasedevaluationmodeloneinternalmedicineresidencyprogramsfindings
AT suzannesunday impactonhousestaffevaluationscoreswhenchangingfromadreyfustoamilestonebasedevaluationmodeloneinternalmedicineresidencyprogramsfindings
AT saimachaudhry impactonhousestaffevaluationscoreswhenchangingfromadreyfustoamilestonebasedevaluationmodeloneinternalmedicineresidencyprogramsfindings
_version_ 1724726326757163008