Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The oncological safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer remains uncertain and conflicting. The aim of the proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the available evidence examining the association between diagnostic hysteroscopy and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian Wen Zhang, Zhao Juan Qin, Yue Dong He, Ai Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e041981.full
id doaj-a7bbbc1b277c4cc6a135a51c217aa07e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7bbbc1b277c4cc6a135a51c217aa07e2021-08-30T23:00:03ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-12-01101210.1136/bmjopen-2020-041981Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisQian Wen Zhang0Zhao Juan Qin1Yue Dong He2Ai Zheng3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, ChinaBackground The oncological safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer remains uncertain and conflicting. The aim of the proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the available evidence examining the association between diagnostic hysteroscopy and the prognosis of stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer and to statistically synthesise the results of relevant studies.Methods and analysis Systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be undertaken using prespecified search strategies. Two authors will independently conduct eligible studies selection process, perform data extraction and appraise the quality of included studies. Original case–control studies, cohort studies and randomised controlled trails published in English will be considered for inclusion. The outcomes of interest will be 5-year recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Meta-analyses will be performed to calculate pooled estimates.Ethics and dissemination Our study will be based on published data, and thus there is no requirement for ethics approval. The results will be shared through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020193696.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e041981.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qian Wen Zhang
Zhao Juan Qin
Yue Dong He
Ai Zheng
spellingShingle Qian Wen Zhang
Zhao Juan Qin
Yue Dong He
Ai Zheng
Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open
author_facet Qian Wen Zhang
Zhao Juan Qin
Yue Dong He
Ai Zheng
author_sort Qian Wen Zhang
title Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage i endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background The oncological safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer remains uncertain and conflicting. The aim of the proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the available evidence examining the association between diagnostic hysteroscopy and the prognosis of stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer and to statistically synthesise the results of relevant studies.Methods and analysis Systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be undertaken using prespecified search strategies. Two authors will independently conduct eligible studies selection process, perform data extraction and appraise the quality of included studies. Original case–control studies, cohort studies and randomised controlled trails published in English will be considered for inclusion. The outcomes of interest will be 5-year recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Meta-analyses will be performed to calculate pooled estimates.Ethics and dissemination Our study will be based on published data, and thus there is no requirement for ethics approval. The results will be shared through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020193696.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/12/e041981.full
work_keys_str_mv AT qianwenzhang oncologicalsafetyofhysteroscopyinthediagnosisofstageiendometrialcancerprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaojuanqin oncologicalsafetyofhysteroscopyinthediagnosisofstageiendometrialcancerprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuedonghe oncologicalsafetyofhysteroscopyinthediagnosisofstageiendometrialcancerprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aizheng oncologicalsafetyofhysteroscopyinthediagnosisofstageiendometrialcancerprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721184927736659968