A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science

Global greenhouse gas emissions have increased at a rate of nearly 2% per year since 1970, and the rate of increase has been increasing. The contribution of greenhouse gases to global warming constitutes an environmental management challenge requiring interdisciplinary effort and international coope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heidi K. Edmonds, Julie E. Lovell, C. A. Knox Lovell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-10-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/62
id doaj-a7b825d13f2542928ab74b40b9d6ff29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7b825d13f2542928ab74b40b9d6ff292020-11-25T00:49:06ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762017-10-01646210.3390/resources6040062resources6040062A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social ScienceHeidi K. Edmonds0Julie E. Lovell1C. A. Knox Lovell2Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, QLD, AustraliaGlobal greenhouse gas emissions have increased at a rate of nearly 2% per year since 1970, and the rate of increase has been increasing. The contribution of greenhouse gases to global warming constitutes an environmental management challenge requiring interdisciplinary effort and international cooperation. In an effort to meet this challenge, the Kyoto Protocol imposes limits on aggregate CO2-equivalent emissions of four greenhouse gases, although it permits countries to trade off one gas for another at specified rates. This requires a definition of trade-off rates, which the Protocol specifies as Global Warming Potentials, although these have been controversial since their introduction. The primary source of concern has been the constancy of the trade-off rates, both across countries and through time. We propose a new composite index that allows freely variable trade-off rates, thereby facilitating the design of efficient abatement policy. In a pair of exercises we compare our composite index with that used by the Protocol. In both exercises we reject the constancy of trade-off rates, although despite the significantly different weighting schemes we find a degree of concordance between the two greenhouse gas indices.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/62global warminggreenhouse gasesaggregationcomposite indexDEA (data envelopment analysis)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Heidi K. Edmonds
Julie E. Lovell
C. A. Knox Lovell
spellingShingle Heidi K. Edmonds
Julie E. Lovell
C. A. Knox Lovell
A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science
Resources
global warming
greenhouse gases
aggregation
composite index
DEA (data envelopment analysis)
author_facet Heidi K. Edmonds
Julie E. Lovell
C. A. Knox Lovell
author_sort Heidi K. Edmonds
title A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science
title_short A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science
title_full A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science
title_fullStr A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science
title_full_unstemmed A New Composite Index for Greenhouse Gases: Climate Science Meets Social Science
title_sort new composite index for greenhouse gases: climate science meets social science
publisher MDPI AG
series Resources
issn 2079-9276
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Global greenhouse gas emissions have increased at a rate of nearly 2% per year since 1970, and the rate of increase has been increasing. The contribution of greenhouse gases to global warming constitutes an environmental management challenge requiring interdisciplinary effort and international cooperation. In an effort to meet this challenge, the Kyoto Protocol imposes limits on aggregate CO2-equivalent emissions of four greenhouse gases, although it permits countries to trade off one gas for another at specified rates. This requires a definition of trade-off rates, which the Protocol specifies as Global Warming Potentials, although these have been controversial since their introduction. The primary source of concern has been the constancy of the trade-off rates, both across countries and through time. We propose a new composite index that allows freely variable trade-off rates, thereby facilitating the design of efficient abatement policy. In a pair of exercises we compare our composite index with that used by the Protocol. In both exercises we reject the constancy of trade-off rates, although despite the significantly different weighting schemes we find a degree of concordance between the two greenhouse gas indices.
topic global warming
greenhouse gases
aggregation
composite index
DEA (data envelopment analysis)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/62
work_keys_str_mv AT heidikedmonds anewcompositeindexforgreenhousegasesclimatesciencemeetssocialscience
AT julieelovell anewcompositeindexforgreenhousegasesclimatesciencemeetssocialscience
AT caknoxlovell anewcompositeindexforgreenhousegasesclimatesciencemeetssocialscience
AT heidikedmonds newcompositeindexforgreenhousegasesclimatesciencemeetssocialscience
AT julieelovell newcompositeindexforgreenhousegasesclimatesciencemeetssocialscience
AT caknoxlovell newcompositeindexforgreenhousegasesclimatesciencemeetssocialscience
_version_ 1725252926842077184