Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing

Abstract Background Joints withstand huge forces, but little is known about subchondral pressures and perfusion during loading. We developed an in vitro calf foot model to explore intraosseous pressure (IOP) and subchondral perfusion during weight bearing. Methods Freshly culled calf forefeet were p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Beverly, Barbara E. Marks, David W Murray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01754-y
id doaj-a7b7a07942dd48bf920a18f92a8810de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7b7a07942dd48bf920a18f92a8810de2020-11-25T03:01:49ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2020-06-011511910.1186/s13018-020-01754-ySubchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearingMichael Beverly0Barbara E. Marks1David W Murray2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic CentreNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic CentreNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic CentreAbstract Background Joints withstand huge forces, but little is known about subchondral pressures and perfusion during loading. We developed an in vitro calf foot model to explore intraosseous pressure (IOP) and subchondral perfusion during weight bearing. Methods Freshly culled calf forefeet were perfused with serum. IOP was measured at three sites in the foot using intraosseous needles, pressure transducers, and digital recorders. IOP was measured during perfusion, with and without a tourniquet and with differing weights, including static loading and dynamic loading to resemble walking. Results IOP varied with perfusion pressure. Static loading increased subchondral IOP whether the bone was non-perfused, perfused, or perfused with a proximal venous tourniquet (p < 0.0001). Under all perfusion states, IOP was proportional to the load (R 2 = 0.984). Subchondral IOP often exceeded perfusion pressure. On removal of a load, IOP fell to below the pre-load value. Repetitive loading led to a falling IOP whether the foot was perfused or not. Conclusion Superimposed on a variable background IOP, increased perfusion and physiological loading caused a significant increase in subchondral IOP. Force was thereby transmitted through subchondral bone partly by hydraulic pressure. A falling IOP with repeat loading suggests that there is an intraosseous one-way valve. This offers a new understanding of subchondral perfusion physiology.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01754-yIntraosseous pressureSubchondral perfusionHydraulicBone fatMarrowValve
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Beverly
Barbara E. Marks
David W Murray
spellingShingle Michael Beverly
Barbara E. Marks
David W Murray
Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Intraosseous pressure
Subchondral perfusion
Hydraulic
Bone fat
Marrow
Valve
author_facet Michael Beverly
Barbara E. Marks
David W Murray
author_sort Michael Beverly
title Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
title_short Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
title_full Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
title_fullStr Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
title_full_unstemmed Subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
title_sort subchondral pressures and perfusion during weight bearing
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Joints withstand huge forces, but little is known about subchondral pressures and perfusion during loading. We developed an in vitro calf foot model to explore intraosseous pressure (IOP) and subchondral perfusion during weight bearing. Methods Freshly culled calf forefeet were perfused with serum. IOP was measured at three sites in the foot using intraosseous needles, pressure transducers, and digital recorders. IOP was measured during perfusion, with and without a tourniquet and with differing weights, including static loading and dynamic loading to resemble walking. Results IOP varied with perfusion pressure. Static loading increased subchondral IOP whether the bone was non-perfused, perfused, or perfused with a proximal venous tourniquet (p < 0.0001). Under all perfusion states, IOP was proportional to the load (R 2 = 0.984). Subchondral IOP often exceeded perfusion pressure. On removal of a load, IOP fell to below the pre-load value. Repetitive loading led to a falling IOP whether the foot was perfused or not. Conclusion Superimposed on a variable background IOP, increased perfusion and physiological loading caused a significant increase in subchondral IOP. Force was thereby transmitted through subchondral bone partly by hydraulic pressure. A falling IOP with repeat loading suggests that there is an intraosseous one-way valve. This offers a new understanding of subchondral perfusion physiology.
topic Intraosseous pressure
Subchondral perfusion
Hydraulic
Bone fat
Marrow
Valve
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-020-01754-y
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelbeverly subchondralpressuresandperfusionduringweightbearing
AT barbaraemarks subchondralpressuresandperfusionduringweightbearing
AT davidwmurray subchondralpressuresandperfusionduringweightbearing
_version_ 1724691734247505920