Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature

The most accepted management for symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) is the closure of the hiatal gap associated with an antireflux procedure. When the defect of the hiatus is particularly wide or the consistency of the pillars is weak, a prosthetic mesh may be used to cover the suture cruropl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sonia Fernandez.Ananin, David Sacoto, Carmen Balagué, Carlos Guarner, Eduardo M Targarona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2020;volume=3;issue=4;spage=158;epage=161;aulast=Fernandez.Ananin
id doaj-a7b46795559d40d3a8c7079aa4723037
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7b46795559d40d3a8c7079aa47230372020-12-02T12:52:12ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery2589-87362589-80782020-01-013415816110.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_21_20Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literatureSonia Fernandez.AnaninDavid SacotoCarmen BalaguéCarlos GuarnerEduardo M TargaronaThe most accepted management for symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) is the closure of the hiatal gap associated with an antireflux procedure. When the defect of the hiatus is particularly wide or the consistency of the pillars is weak, a prosthetic mesh may be used to cover the suture cruroplasty. Nevertheless, the use of mesh in PEHs repair is a subject of ongoing debate, due to the local risk of complications that a foreign body located in this area can lead. We present the case of a 77-year-old female who underwent PEH surgery with placement of polypropylene mesh twice. On both occasions, the prosthesis migrated late through the wall of the esophagus and could be removed by endoscopy. We consider that this case is exceptional, not only due to the multiple and late extrusion of the mesh in the lumen of the esophagus but also due to the absence of symptoms that this event caused to the patient.http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2020;volume=3;issue=4;spage=158;epage=161;aulast=Fernandez.Ananincomplicationsmeshparaesophageal herniasurgical treatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sonia Fernandez.Ananin
David Sacoto
Carmen Balagué
Carlos Guarner
Eduardo M Targarona
spellingShingle Sonia Fernandez.Ananin
David Sacoto
Carmen Balagué
Carlos Guarner
Eduardo M Targarona
Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature
International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
complications
mesh
paraesophageal hernia
surgical treatment
author_facet Sonia Fernandez.Ananin
David Sacoto
Carmen Balagué
Carlos Guarner
Eduardo M Targarona
author_sort Sonia Fernandez.Ananin
title Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature
title_short Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature
title_full Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature
title_fullStr Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: A case report and review of the literature
title_sort recurrent and late esophageal mesh extrusion after paraesophageal hiatoplasty: a case report and review of the literature
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery
issn 2589-8736
2589-8078
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The most accepted management for symptomatic paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) is the closure of the hiatal gap associated with an antireflux procedure. When the defect of the hiatus is particularly wide or the consistency of the pillars is weak, a prosthetic mesh may be used to cover the suture cruroplasty. Nevertheless, the use of mesh in PEHs repair is a subject of ongoing debate, due to the local risk of complications that a foreign body located in this area can lead. We present the case of a 77-year-old female who underwent PEH surgery with placement of polypropylene mesh twice. On both occasions, the prosthesis migrated late through the wall of the esophagus and could be removed by endoscopy. We consider that this case is exceptional, not only due to the multiple and late extrusion of the mesh in the lumen of the esophagus but also due to the absence of symptoms that this event caused to the patient.
topic complications
mesh
paraesophageal hernia
surgical treatment
url http://www.herniasurgeryjournal.org/article.asp?issn=2589-8736;year=2020;volume=3;issue=4;spage=158;epage=161;aulast=Fernandez.Ananin
work_keys_str_mv AT soniafernandezananin recurrentandlateesophagealmeshextrusionafterparaesophagealhiatoplastyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT davidsacoto recurrentandlateesophagealmeshextrusionafterparaesophagealhiatoplastyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT carmenbalague recurrentandlateesophagealmeshextrusionafterparaesophagealhiatoplastyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT carlosguarner recurrentandlateesophagealmeshextrusionafterparaesophagealhiatoplastyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
AT eduardomtargarona recurrentandlateesophagealmeshextrusionafterparaesophagealhiatoplastyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724406567796736000