Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries

Many of the Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEEC) that are subject to The “16+1” Platform under China’s Belt and Road Initiative, including Romania, are member states of the European Union (EU) and their economic development strategies are implicitly dependent on the European Union’s goals,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: RĂZVAN VOINESCU, CRISTIAN MOISOIU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University 2019-06-01
Series:Global Economic Observer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_7_no_1/geo_2019_vol7_no1_art_022.pdf
id doaj-a7a70fc6118c4b47a06d5ce243f495cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7a70fc6118c4b47a06d5ce243f495cc2020-11-25T02:40:26ZengNicolae Titulescu UniversityGlobal Economic Observer2343-97422343-97502019-06-0171195204Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe CountriesRĂZVAN VOINESCU0CRISTIAN MOISOIU1Institute for World Economy Bucharest Calea 13 Septembrie, Bucharest, ROMANIA razvanvoinescu@gmail.comInstitute for World Economy Bucharest Calea 13 Septembrie, Bucharest, ROMANIA cmoisoiu@iem.ro Many of the Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEEC) that are subject to The “16+1” Platform under China’s Belt and Road Initiative, including Romania, are member states of the European Union (EU) and their economic development strategies are implicitly dependent on the European Union’s goals, financing mechanisms and regulations. On the other hand, the CEEC’s geographical position, bridging Asia and Western Europe and their economic potential in the global value and production chain make them indispensable for BRI integration within Eurasia. Furthermore, in a more and more restrictive European context, due to Brexit and the refugee crisis, meeting the financing needs for development and economic growth is crucial for this group of countries in order to ensure their real convergence with the more developed West. In such a context, the present paper aims at bringing a contribution to the following pressing question for Brussels, in terms of geopolitical and economic concerns, namely, whether BRI can become a complementary support instrument to the European policies fostering CEEC’s integration with the West and not a competitive strategy hindering EU’s interests. To this aim, we try to investigate some of the features of specific cases of similar infrastructure investments in CEEC, financed by European funds and within the BRI framework, respectively, in order to have a base for a comparative analysis.http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_7_no_1/geo_2019_vol7_no1_art_022.pdfeconomic integrationeconomic developmentinternational relationseconomic cooperationgeopoliticsEuropean UnionBelt and Road
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author RĂZVAN VOINESCU
CRISTIAN MOISOIU
spellingShingle RĂZVAN VOINESCU
CRISTIAN MOISOIU
Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries
Global Economic Observer
economic integration
economic development
international relations
economic cooperation
geopolitics
European Union
Belt and Road
author_facet RĂZVAN VOINESCU
CRISTIAN MOISOIU
author_sort RĂZVAN VOINESCU
title Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_short Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_full Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_fullStr Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_full_unstemmed Belt and Road Initiative and Possible Implications for Central and Eastern Europe Countries
title_sort belt and road initiative and possible implications for central and eastern europe countries
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University
series Global Economic Observer
issn 2343-9742
2343-9750
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Many of the Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEEC) that are subject to The “16+1” Platform under China’s Belt and Road Initiative, including Romania, are member states of the European Union (EU) and their economic development strategies are implicitly dependent on the European Union’s goals, financing mechanisms and regulations. On the other hand, the CEEC’s geographical position, bridging Asia and Western Europe and their economic potential in the global value and production chain make them indispensable for BRI integration within Eurasia. Furthermore, in a more and more restrictive European context, due to Brexit and the refugee crisis, meeting the financing needs for development and economic growth is crucial for this group of countries in order to ensure their real convergence with the more developed West. In such a context, the present paper aims at bringing a contribution to the following pressing question for Brussels, in terms of geopolitical and economic concerns, namely, whether BRI can become a complementary support instrument to the European policies fostering CEEC’s integration with the West and not a competitive strategy hindering EU’s interests. To this aim, we try to investigate some of the features of specific cases of similar infrastructure investments in CEEC, financed by European funds and within the BRI framework, respectively, in order to have a base for a comparative analysis.
topic economic integration
economic development
international relations
economic cooperation
geopolitics
European Union
Belt and Road
url http://www.globeco.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_7_no_1/geo_2019_vol7_no1_art_022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT razvanvoinescu beltandroadinitiativeandpossibleimplicationsforcentralandeasterneuropecountries
AT cristianmoisoiu beltandroadinitiativeandpossibleimplicationsforcentralandeasterneuropecountries
_version_ 1724781681298112512