"I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND:Before using any prediction rule oriented towards pulmonary embolism (PE), family physicians (FPs) should have some suspicion of this diagnosis. The diagnostic reasoning process leading to the suspicion of PE is not well described in primary care. OBJECTIVE:to explore the diagnostic reaso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Barais, Nathalie Morio, Amélie Cuzon Breton, Pierre Barraine, Amélie Calvez, Erik Stolper, Paul Van Royen, Claire Liétard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4026480?pdf=render
id doaj-a7969c19f5b14e56b5a8b7a60e25078a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7969c19f5b14e56b5a8b7a60e25078a2020-11-24T22:18:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9811210.1371/journal.pone.0098112"I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.Marie BaraisNathalie MorioAmélie Cuzon BretonPierre BarraineAmélie CalvezErik StolperPaul Van RoyenClaire LiétardBACKGROUND:Before using any prediction rule oriented towards pulmonary embolism (PE), family physicians (FPs) should have some suspicion of this diagnosis. The diagnostic reasoning process leading to the suspicion of PE is not well described in primary care. OBJECTIVE:to explore the diagnostic reasoning of FPs when pulmonary embolism is suspected. METHOD:Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 28 FPs. The regional hospital supplied data of all their cases of pulmonary embolism from June to November 2011. The patient's FP was identified where he/she had been the physician who had sent the patient to the emergency unit. The first consecutive 14 FPs who agreed to participate made up the first group. A second group was chosen using a purposeful sampling method. The topic guide focused on the circumstances leading to the suspicion of PE. A thematic analysis was performed, by three researchers, using a grounded theory coding paradigm. RESULTS:In the FPs' experience, the suspicion of pulmonary embolism arose out of four considerations: the absence of indicative clinical signs for diagnoses other than PE, a sudden change in the condition of the patient, a gut feeling that something was seriously wrong and an earlier failure to diagnose PE. The FPs interviewed did not use rules in their diagnostic process. CONCLUSION:This study illustrated the diagnostic role of gut feelings in the specific context of suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care. The FPs used the sense of alarm as a tool to prevent the diagnostic error of missing a PE. The diagnostic accuracy of gut feelings has yet to be evaluated.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4026480?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie Barais
Nathalie Morio
Amélie Cuzon Breton
Pierre Barraine
Amélie Calvez
Erik Stolper
Paul Van Royen
Claire Liétard
spellingShingle Marie Barais
Nathalie Morio
Amélie Cuzon Breton
Pierre Barraine
Amélie Calvez
Erik Stolper
Paul Van Royen
Claire Liétard
"I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Marie Barais
Nathalie Morio
Amélie Cuzon Breton
Pierre Barraine
Amélie Calvez
Erik Stolper
Paul Van Royen
Claire Liétard
author_sort Marie Barais
title "I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
title_short "I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
title_full "I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
title_fullStr "I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
title_full_unstemmed "I can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": Diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
title_sort "i can't find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism": diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Before using any prediction rule oriented towards pulmonary embolism (PE), family physicians (FPs) should have some suspicion of this diagnosis. The diagnostic reasoning process leading to the suspicion of PE is not well described in primary care. OBJECTIVE:to explore the diagnostic reasoning of FPs when pulmonary embolism is suspected. METHOD:Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 28 FPs. The regional hospital supplied data of all their cases of pulmonary embolism from June to November 2011. The patient's FP was identified where he/she had been the physician who had sent the patient to the emergency unit. The first consecutive 14 FPs who agreed to participate made up the first group. A second group was chosen using a purposeful sampling method. The topic guide focused on the circumstances leading to the suspicion of PE. A thematic analysis was performed, by three researchers, using a grounded theory coding paradigm. RESULTS:In the FPs' experience, the suspicion of pulmonary embolism arose out of four considerations: the absence of indicative clinical signs for diagnoses other than PE, a sudden change in the condition of the patient, a gut feeling that something was seriously wrong and an earlier failure to diagnose PE. The FPs interviewed did not use rules in their diagnostic process. CONCLUSION:This study illustrated the diagnostic role of gut feelings in the specific context of suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care. The FPs used the sense of alarm as a tool to prevent the diagnostic error of missing a PE. The diagnostic accuracy of gut feelings has yet to be evaluated.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4026480?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mariebarais icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT nathaliemorio icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT ameliecuzonbreton icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT pierrebarraine icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT ameliecalvez icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT erikstolper icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT paulvanroyen icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT clairelietard icantfindanythingwrongitmustbeapulmonaryembolismdiagnosingsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminprimarycareaqualitativestudy
_version_ 1725781074645090304