Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version

Background: Sensory processing is important for children in their cognitive development, sensorimotor skill, motor planning, language, emotion, including social skill. If children had sensory processing dysfunction, these development and skills might be affected and then impacted children’s occupati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Chinchai, S. Sriphetcharawut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Chaing Mai University 2010-09-01
Series:Journal of Associated Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/60078
id doaj-a77066c8640e4e919c8ebb824f92f501
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a77066c8640e4e919c8ebb824f92f5012020-11-25T01:18:06ZengChaing Mai UniversityJournal of Associated Medical Sciences2539-60562539-60562010-09-0143320120160078Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai VersionS. Chinchai0S. Sriphetcharawut1Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Association Medical Science, Chiang Mai UniversityDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Association Medical Science, Chiang Mai UniversityBackground: Sensory processing is important for children in their cognitive development, sensorimotor skill, motor planning, language, emotion, including social skill. If children had sensory processing dysfunction, these development and skills might be affected and then impacted children’s occupational performance. Lack of reliability and validity of the sensory processing assessment tool for Thai children was still commonly found in Thailand. Objectives : This developmental research was to develop the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for assessing sensory processing of children from birth to 36 months old in Thai version and to examine its psychometric properties; content validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Methods: The Sensory Profile was translated from original version to target version by the researchers. Two experts in occupational therapy conducted the back translation process on the target version and then examined for its content validity evidence by three occupational therapists who had at least 3 years using the sensory integrative approach for their clinical practice. The index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) on each item was calculated and the items that showed over 0.5 of IOC were constituted for the target version of the sensory profile assessment tool. Afterward, the examination of 2 types reliability; internal consistency and test-retest reliability, was conducted in parents of 30 infants with birth to 6 months of age and 30 children with 7 to 36 months of age. These parents were recruited from the well baby clinics of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. Results: The panel experts resulted in the establishment of content validity of the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 36 Months Old, Thai Version with IOC over 0.5 of all items. Using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to examine test-retest reliability, the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 6 Months Old, Thai Version had shown an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .92) and the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from from 7 to 36 Months Old, Thai Version had shown an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .89). The analysis of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient revealed the high internal consistency of the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 6 Months Old, Thai Version (α = .74) and of the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from 7 to 36 Months Old, Thai Version in all areas (α = .92). Internal consistency reliability of each sensory processing in the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 6 Months Old, Thai Version was within the acceptable range (.41-.70) for tactile processing, vestibular processing, and visual processing (α =.60, .53, .42, respectively), except auditory processing (α = .38). Internal consistency reliability of each sensory processing in the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from 7 to 36 Months Old, Thai Version was within the high range (> 0.7) for tactile processing (α =.90), and was within the acceptable range for vestibular processing, oral processing, auditory processing, and visual processing (α =.70, .66, .65, and .61, respectively). Conclusion: The Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 36 Months Old, Thai Version has known to be reliable and valid.https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/60078Sensory ProfileBack translationContent validityTest-retest reliabilityInternal consistencyOccupational Therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Chinchai
S. Sriphetcharawut
spellingShingle S. Chinchai
S. Sriphetcharawut
Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version
Journal of Associated Medical Sciences
Sensory Profile
Back translation
Content validity
Test-retest reliability
Internal consistency
Occupational Therapy
author_facet S. Chinchai
S. Sriphetcharawut
author_sort S. Chinchai
title Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version
title_short Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version
title_full Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version
title_fullStr Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version
title_full_unstemmed Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children 0 – 36 months of Age, Thai Version
title_sort sensory profile assessment tool for children 0 – 36 months of age, thai version
publisher Chaing Mai University
series Journal of Associated Medical Sciences
issn 2539-6056
2539-6056
publishDate 2010-09-01
description Background: Sensory processing is important for children in their cognitive development, sensorimotor skill, motor planning, language, emotion, including social skill. If children had sensory processing dysfunction, these development and skills might be affected and then impacted children’s occupational performance. Lack of reliability and validity of the sensory processing assessment tool for Thai children was still commonly found in Thailand. Objectives : This developmental research was to develop the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for assessing sensory processing of children from birth to 36 months old in Thai version and to examine its psychometric properties; content validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Methods: The Sensory Profile was translated from original version to target version by the researchers. Two experts in occupational therapy conducted the back translation process on the target version and then examined for its content validity evidence by three occupational therapists who had at least 3 years using the sensory integrative approach for their clinical practice. The index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) on each item was calculated and the items that showed over 0.5 of IOC were constituted for the target version of the sensory profile assessment tool. Afterward, the examination of 2 types reliability; internal consistency and test-retest reliability, was conducted in parents of 30 infants with birth to 6 months of age and 30 children with 7 to 36 months of age. These parents were recruited from the well baby clinics of Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. Results: The panel experts resulted in the establishment of content validity of the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 36 Months Old, Thai Version with IOC over 0.5 of all items. Using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to examine test-retest reliability, the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 6 Months Old, Thai Version had shown an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .92) and the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from from 7 to 36 Months Old, Thai Version had shown an excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = .89). The analysis of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient revealed the high internal consistency of the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 6 Months Old, Thai Version (α = .74) and of the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from 7 to 36 Months Old, Thai Version in all areas (α = .92). Internal consistency reliability of each sensory processing in the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 6 Months Old, Thai Version was within the acceptable range (.41-.70) for tactile processing, vestibular processing, and visual processing (α =.60, .53, .42, respectively), except auditory processing (α = .38). Internal consistency reliability of each sensory processing in the Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from 7 to 36 Months Old, Thai Version was within the high range (> 0.7) for tactile processing (α =.90), and was within the acceptable range for vestibular processing, oral processing, auditory processing, and visual processing (α =.70, .66, .65, and .61, respectively). Conclusion: The Sensory Profile Assessment Tool for Children from Birth to 36 Months Old, Thai Version has known to be reliable and valid.
topic Sensory Profile
Back translation
Content validity
Test-retest reliability
Internal consistency
Occupational Therapy
url https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bulletinAMS/article/view/60078
work_keys_str_mv AT schinchai sensoryprofileassessmenttoolforchildren036monthsofagethaiversion
AT ssriphetcharawut sensoryprofileassessmenttoolforchildren036monthsofagethaiversion
_version_ 1725143698532990976