Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatment guidelines recommend LDL-C as the primary target of therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, combination therapies with lipid-lowering drugs that have different mechanisms of action are recommended when it i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanson Mary E, Le Grazie Cristina, Zaninelli Augusto, Rotella Carlo M, Gensini Gian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-07-01
Series:Lipids in Health and Disease
Online Access:http://www.lipidworld.com/content/9/1/80
id doaj-a7623a8c3064410384a72a25a48d6c59
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a7623a8c3064410384a72a25a48d6c592020-11-24T22:24:40ZengBMCLipids in Health and Disease1476-511X2010-07-01918010.1186/1476-511X-9-80Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetesHanson Mary ELe Grazie CristinaZaninelli AugustoRotella Carlo MGensini Gian<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatment guidelines recommend LDL-C as the primary target of therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, combination therapies with lipid-lowering drugs that have different mechanisms of action are recommended when it is not possible to attain LDL-C targets with statin monotherapy. Understanding which treatment or patient-related factors are associated with attaining a target may be clinically relevant.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data were pooled from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies. After stabilization on simvastatin 20 mg, patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) alone and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg (EZ/Simva) or simvastatin 40 mg. The change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TC/HDL-C ratio, triglycerides, and the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) after 6 weeks of treatment were assessed, and factors significantly correlated with the probability of achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L in a population of high cardiovascular risk Italian patients were identified. A stepwise logistic regression model was conducted with LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L at endpoint as the dependent variable and study, treatment, gender, age (≥65 years or < 65 years), as independent variables and baseline LDL-C (both as continuous and discrete variable).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>EZ/Simva treatment (N = 93) resulted in significantly greater reductions in LDL-C, TC, and TC/HDL-C ratio and higher attainment of LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L vs doubling the simvastatin dose to 40 mg (N = 106). Study [including diabetic patients (OR = 2.9, p = 0.003)], EZ/Simva treatment (OR = 6.1, p < 0.001), and lower baseline LDL-C (OR = 0.9, p = 0.001) were significant positive predictors of LDL-C target achievement. When baseline LDL-C was expressed as a discrete variable, the odds of achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was 4.8 in favor of EZ/Simva compared with Simva 40 mg (p < 0.001), regardless of baseline LDL-C level.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>EZ/Simva is an effective therapeutic option for patients who have not achieved recommended LDL-C treatment targets with simvastatin 20 mg monotherapy.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT00423488 and NCT00423579</p> http://www.lipidworld.com/content/9/1/80
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanson Mary E
Le Grazie Cristina
Zaninelli Augusto
Rotella Carlo M
Gensini Gian
spellingShingle Hanson Mary E
Le Grazie Cristina
Zaninelli Augusto
Rotella Carlo M
Gensini Gian
Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
Lipids in Health and Disease
author_facet Hanson Mary E
Le Grazie Cristina
Zaninelli Augusto
Rotella Carlo M
Gensini Gian
author_sort Hanson Mary E
title Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
title_short Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
title_full Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
title_fullStr Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
title_sort ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes
publisher BMC
series Lipids in Health and Disease
issn 1476-511X
publishDate 2010-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Treatment guidelines recommend LDL-C as the primary target of therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, combination therapies with lipid-lowering drugs that have different mechanisms of action are recommended when it is not possible to attain LDL-C targets with statin monotherapy. Understanding which treatment or patient-related factors are associated with attaining a target may be clinically relevant.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data were pooled from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies. After stabilization on simvastatin 20 mg, patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) alone and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were randomized to ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 20 mg (EZ/Simva) or simvastatin 40 mg. The change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TC/HDL-C ratio, triglycerides, and the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) after 6 weeks of treatment were assessed, and factors significantly correlated with the probability of achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L in a population of high cardiovascular risk Italian patients were identified. A stepwise logistic regression model was conducted with LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L at endpoint as the dependent variable and study, treatment, gender, age (≥65 years or < 65 years), as independent variables and baseline LDL-C (both as continuous and discrete variable).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>EZ/Simva treatment (N = 93) resulted in significantly greater reductions in LDL-C, TC, and TC/HDL-C ratio and higher attainment of LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L vs doubling the simvastatin dose to 40 mg (N = 106). Study [including diabetic patients (OR = 2.9, p = 0.003)], EZ/Simva treatment (OR = 6.1, p < 0.001), and lower baseline LDL-C (OR = 0.9, p = 0.001) were significant positive predictors of LDL-C target achievement. When baseline LDL-C was expressed as a discrete variable, the odds of achieving LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was 4.8 in favor of EZ/Simva compared with Simva 40 mg (p < 0.001), regardless of baseline LDL-C level.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>EZ/Simva is an effective therapeutic option for patients who have not achieved recommended LDL-C treatment targets with simvastatin 20 mg monotherapy.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT00423488 and NCT00423579</p>
url http://www.lipidworld.com/content/9/1/80
work_keys_str_mv AT hansonmarye ezetimibesimvastatinvssimvastatinincoronaryheartdiseasepatientswithorwithoutdiabetes
AT legraziecristina ezetimibesimvastatinvssimvastatinincoronaryheartdiseasepatientswithorwithoutdiabetes
AT zaninelliaugusto ezetimibesimvastatinvssimvastatinincoronaryheartdiseasepatientswithorwithoutdiabetes
AT rotellacarlom ezetimibesimvastatinvssimvastatinincoronaryheartdiseasepatientswithorwithoutdiabetes
AT gensinigian ezetimibesimvastatinvssimvastatinincoronaryheartdiseasepatientswithorwithoutdiabetes
_version_ 1725760312130404352