Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights

This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the strained relations between power and justice in the enforcement of fundamental rights, making a comparison between the theoretical concepts of Hans Kelsen and Robert Alexy. In this sense, are compared the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matheus Felipe de Castro, Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito 2016-05-01
Series:Conpedi Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://portaltutor.com/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/88
id doaj-a73272c853a2419b813dd56e764a7035
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a73272c853a2419b813dd56e764a70352020-11-24T21:17:16ZspaConselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em DireitoConpedi Law Review2448-39312448-39312016-05-011413415182Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental RightsMatheus Felipe de Castro0Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches1Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina-UNOESCMestrado em Direito da UNITOLEDO/AraçatubaThis article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the strained relations between power and justice in the enforcement of fundamental rights, making a comparison between the theoretical concepts of Hans Kelsen and Robert Alexy. In this sense, are compared the thoughts of these two authors, emphasizing the central role that power has the legal conception of the first as opposed to the theory of justice that animates the legal conceptions of the second. We discuss how this tension that appears in the theoretical confrontation of the two authors is actually a moment of real, but constitutes a dialectical interaction which must be observed and deciphered in the concrete application of the law. It concludes with the search of separation from what is real from what is in this ideological debate, seeking to deepen the debate on fundamental rights as the core of modern structural theory of law.http://portaltutor.com/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/88Direitos FundamentaisPoderJustiçaFilosofia da PráxisInterpretaçãoAplicação do Direito.
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matheus Felipe de Castro
Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches
spellingShingle Matheus Felipe de Castro
Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches
Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
Conpedi Law Review
Direitos Fundamentais
Poder
Justiça
Filosofia da Práxis
Interpretação
Aplicação do Direito.
author_facet Matheus Felipe de Castro
Samyra Hay dêe Dal Farra Naspolini Sanches
author_sort Matheus Felipe de Castro
title Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_short Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_full Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_fullStr Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_full_unstemmed Positivism and Constitutional Post- positivism : A Debate on Breast Theory of Fundamental Rights
title_sort positivism and constitutional post- positivism : a debate on breast theory of fundamental rights
publisher Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito
series Conpedi Law Review
issn 2448-3931
2448-3931
publishDate 2016-05-01
description This article, based on the theoretical framework of the philosophy of praxis, is to discuss the strained relations between power and justice in the enforcement of fundamental rights, making a comparison between the theoretical concepts of Hans Kelsen and Robert Alexy. In this sense, are compared the thoughts of these two authors, emphasizing the central role that power has the legal conception of the first as opposed to the theory of justice that animates the legal conceptions of the second. We discuss how this tension that appears in the theoretical confrontation of the two authors is actually a moment of real, but constitutes a dialectical interaction which must be observed and deciphered in the concrete application of the law. It concludes with the search of separation from what is real from what is in this ideological debate, seeking to deepen the debate on fundamental rights as the core of modern structural theory of law.
topic Direitos Fundamentais
Poder
Justiça
Filosofia da Práxis
Interpretação
Aplicação do Direito.
url http://portaltutor.com/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/88
work_keys_str_mv AT matheusfelipedecastro positivismandconstitutionalpostpositivismadebateonbreasttheoryoffundamentalrights
AT samyrahaydeedalfarranaspolinisanches positivismandconstitutionalpostpositivismadebateonbreasttheoryoffundamentalrights
_version_ 1726013319560560640