Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory

This paper demonstrates a comprehensive national network-level analysis to determine the relative deteriorations and operational structural performances of the various types of bridge structural design and/or construction. The study analyzes the entire database of the U.S. National Bridge Inventory...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel N. Farhey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Infrastructures
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/3/1/6
id doaj-a729aeaa22d3415797998051144f9b64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a729aeaa22d3415797998051144f9b642020-11-25T01:06:05ZengMDPI AGInfrastructures2412-38112018-03-0131610.3390/infrastructures3010006infrastructures3010006Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge InventoryDaniel N. Farhey0Cincinnati, OH 45231, USAThis paper demonstrates a comprehensive national network-level analysis to determine the relative deteriorations and operational structural performances of the various types of bridge structural design and/or construction. The study analyzes the entire database of the U.S. National Bridge Inventory for the year 2013 and considers bridge counts along with bridge deck areas that provide more significant results. Analysis of the proportional distribution of structural deficiency reveals issues of deterioration. Considering the structural deficiency, service life cycle and deterioration trends of bridge types over time, the multi-criteria equivalent structural performances incorporate the condition, durability, longevity, rate and pattern performances. The results provide support for more sustainable engineering and management decisions. Stringer/multi beam or girder (type 02) bridges are the most common bridge type, 40.75% by counts and 61.88% by areas. The structural performance of type 02 bridges seems comparable to the average of all bridges, yet they have lower durability and longevity performances, revealing a relative service life cycle vulnerability. The lowest structural performances are orthotropic (type 08) and segmental box girder (type 21) bridges; while their condition performances are rather high, their durability, longevity, rate and pattern performances are essentially low. The slight improvement of structural performance from 2006 to 2013 for most bridge types is not significant over seven years. Also, certain bridge types worsened.http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/3/1/6bridgesbridge constructionbridge designdeteriorationlife cyclesperformance characteristicsevaluationstructural behavior
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel N. Farhey
spellingShingle Daniel N. Farhey
Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory
Infrastructures
bridges
bridge construction
bridge design
deterioration
life cycles
performance characteristics
evaluation
structural behavior
author_facet Daniel N. Farhey
author_sort Daniel N. Farhey
title Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory
title_short Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory
title_full Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory
title_fullStr Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory
title_full_unstemmed Structural Performances of Bridge Types in the U.S. National Bridge Inventory
title_sort structural performances of bridge types in the u.s. national bridge inventory
publisher MDPI AG
series Infrastructures
issn 2412-3811
publishDate 2018-03-01
description This paper demonstrates a comprehensive national network-level analysis to determine the relative deteriorations and operational structural performances of the various types of bridge structural design and/or construction. The study analyzes the entire database of the U.S. National Bridge Inventory for the year 2013 and considers bridge counts along with bridge deck areas that provide more significant results. Analysis of the proportional distribution of structural deficiency reveals issues of deterioration. Considering the structural deficiency, service life cycle and deterioration trends of bridge types over time, the multi-criteria equivalent structural performances incorporate the condition, durability, longevity, rate and pattern performances. The results provide support for more sustainable engineering and management decisions. Stringer/multi beam or girder (type 02) bridges are the most common bridge type, 40.75% by counts and 61.88% by areas. The structural performance of type 02 bridges seems comparable to the average of all bridges, yet they have lower durability and longevity performances, revealing a relative service life cycle vulnerability. The lowest structural performances are orthotropic (type 08) and segmental box girder (type 21) bridges; while their condition performances are rather high, their durability, longevity, rate and pattern performances are essentially low. The slight improvement of structural performance from 2006 to 2013 for most bridge types is not significant over seven years. Also, certain bridge types worsened.
topic bridges
bridge construction
bridge design
deterioration
life cycles
performance characteristics
evaluation
structural behavior
url http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/3/1/6
work_keys_str_mv AT danielnfarhey structuralperformancesofbridgetypesintheusnationalbridgeinventory
_version_ 1725191564976717824