Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study

Large-surface radiant heating ceiling systems favor energy-efficient solutions on the heat generation side because of the relatively low temperature of the heat transfer medium. Additionally, their application in the renovation of existing buildings is relatively uncomplicated and requires minimal c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Reza Safizadeh, Lukasz Watly, Andreas Wagner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
CFD
PMV
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3437
id doaj-a712784df86043fab660a3643826a26b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a712784df86043fab660a3643826a26b2020-11-25T02:44:23ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732019-09-011218343710.3390/en12183437en12183437Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical StudyM. Reza Safizadeh0Lukasz Watly1Andreas Wagner2Building Science Group (fbta), Institute for Building Design and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, GermanyBuilding Science Group (fbta), Institute for Building Design and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, GermanyBuilding Science Group (fbta), Institute for Building Design and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, GermanyLarge-surface radiant heating ceiling systems favor energy-efficient solutions on the heat generation side because of the relatively low temperature of the heat transfer medium. Additionally, their application in the renovation of existing buildings is relatively uncomplicated and requires minimal changes to the building’s construction. However, ASHRAE Standard-55 and former studies by Fanger indicated that among large-surface radiant systems, the highest percentage of dissatisfaction for an equal radiant temperature asymmetry (RTA) was reported for a warm ceiling. The maximum RTA of 4 K corresponding to 5% of dissatisfaction was suggested. In the first part of our study (subjective experiments), we have suggested the RTA of about 7.4 K if occupants have winter clothing (Safizadeh et al., 2018). However, former studies tested radiant ceiling systems at different temperatures in “neutral conditions” with a constant operative temperature, which rarely occurs in reality. Accordingly, the goal of this study is to evaluate the potential application of low-temperature radiant heating ceilings in a building with low- and high-performance facades using steady-state simulations with a coupled CFD−thermal comfort model and transient simulations using TRNSYS. Forty combinations of simulation scenarios including six ceiling surface temperatures (20 °C, 25 °C, 28 °C, 33 °C, 38 °C, and 45 °C), two low- and high-performance facades, two rooms with one and two facades, and distances of 1 m and 3 m to the window were examined. The findings of this research show that the supply water temperatures between 28−45 °C from a heat pump are ideal for a building with a high-performance façade. Additionally, the results suggest that ceiling temperatures as low as 20−25 °C in renovated buildings and 25−28 °C in a building with low-performance facades can provide optimal thermal sensations at most body parts. This study also proves that the PMV comfort model (Predicted Mean Vote index) is not at all a suitable model for the evaluation of radiant heating systems (especially if occupants have winter clothes), even if the air/operative temperature distribution near an occupant is uniform.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3437radiant heating ceilingradiant temperature asymmetrylocal thermal sensationCFDUCB thermal comfortPMVTRNSYS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Reza Safizadeh
Lukasz Watly
Andreas Wagner
spellingShingle M. Reza Safizadeh
Lukasz Watly
Andreas Wagner
Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study
Energies
radiant heating ceiling
radiant temperature asymmetry
local thermal sensation
CFD
UCB thermal comfort
PMV
TRNSYS
author_facet M. Reza Safizadeh
Lukasz Watly
Andreas Wagner
author_sort M. Reza Safizadeh
title Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study
title_short Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study
title_full Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Radiant Heating Ceiling Based on Energy and Thermal Comfort Criteria, Part II: A Numerical Study
title_sort evaluation of radiant heating ceiling based on energy and thermal comfort criteria, part ii: a numerical study
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Large-surface radiant heating ceiling systems favor energy-efficient solutions on the heat generation side because of the relatively low temperature of the heat transfer medium. Additionally, their application in the renovation of existing buildings is relatively uncomplicated and requires minimal changes to the building’s construction. However, ASHRAE Standard-55 and former studies by Fanger indicated that among large-surface radiant systems, the highest percentage of dissatisfaction for an equal radiant temperature asymmetry (RTA) was reported for a warm ceiling. The maximum RTA of 4 K corresponding to 5% of dissatisfaction was suggested. In the first part of our study (subjective experiments), we have suggested the RTA of about 7.4 K if occupants have winter clothing (Safizadeh et al., 2018). However, former studies tested radiant ceiling systems at different temperatures in “neutral conditions” with a constant operative temperature, which rarely occurs in reality. Accordingly, the goal of this study is to evaluate the potential application of low-temperature radiant heating ceilings in a building with low- and high-performance facades using steady-state simulations with a coupled CFD−thermal comfort model and transient simulations using TRNSYS. Forty combinations of simulation scenarios including six ceiling surface temperatures (20 °C, 25 °C, 28 °C, 33 °C, 38 °C, and 45 °C), two low- and high-performance facades, two rooms with one and two facades, and distances of 1 m and 3 m to the window were examined. The findings of this research show that the supply water temperatures between 28−45 °C from a heat pump are ideal for a building with a high-performance façade. Additionally, the results suggest that ceiling temperatures as low as 20−25 °C in renovated buildings and 25−28 °C in a building with low-performance facades can provide optimal thermal sensations at most body parts. This study also proves that the PMV comfort model (Predicted Mean Vote index) is not at all a suitable model for the evaluation of radiant heating systems (especially if occupants have winter clothes), even if the air/operative temperature distribution near an occupant is uniform.
topic radiant heating ceiling
radiant temperature asymmetry
local thermal sensation
CFD
UCB thermal comfort
PMV
TRNSYS
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3437
work_keys_str_mv AT mrezasafizadeh evaluationofradiantheatingceilingbasedonenergyandthermalcomfortcriteriapartiianumericalstudy
AT lukaszwatly evaluationofradiantheatingceilingbasedonenergyandthermalcomfortcriteriapartiianumericalstudy
AT andreaswagner evaluationofradiantheatingceilingbasedonenergyandthermalcomfortcriteriapartiianumericalstudy
_version_ 1724766117012963328