The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions

In the present study we have examined the Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and the Council, the European legal instrument governing the right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. The innovations in this paper concern the examination of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bogdan Birzu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bucharest University of Economic Studies 2016-06-01
Series:Juridical Tribune
Subjects:
Online Access:http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v1/10%20Birzu.pdf
id doaj-a70943fbefa0499482240c3c82aff5b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a70943fbefa0499482240c3c82aff5b52020-11-24T21:35:19ZengBucharest University of Economic StudiesJuridical Tribune2247-71952248-03822016-06-0161137147The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinionsBogdan Birzu0„Titu Maiorescu” University of Bucharest, RomaniaIn the present study we have examined the Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and the Council, the European legal instrument governing the right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. The innovations in this paper concern the examination of the regulatory way of the mentioned two rights, the formulated critical opinions and the proposals of de lege ferenda. The value of the paper lies in the de lege ferenda proposals, which that can contribute to improving the system of European legislation in the field, which in the constant interpretation of the ECHR it also requires respecting the right to interpretation and translation in ongoing criminal proceedings. Also, the examination highlights the importance and necessity of adopting this European legal instrument regarding the harmonization of the national laws in terms of compulsoriness and the procedure for complying with the two rights to which we referred, in case where the suspect or the accused is to be judged of the territory of a Member State other than his State of origin. The work can be useful to theorists, practitioners and to the European legislator from the perspective of operating the suggested changes.http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v1/10%20Birzu.pdfsuspectaccusedoffensecriminal proceedingsthe right to a fair trial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bogdan Birzu
spellingShingle Bogdan Birzu
The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions
Juridical Tribune
suspect
accused
offense
criminal proceedings
the right to a fair trial
author_facet Bogdan Birzu
author_sort Bogdan Birzu
title The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions
title_short The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions
title_full The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions
title_fullStr The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions
title_full_unstemmed The right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. Comparative examination. Critical opinions
title_sort right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the european union. comparative examination. critical opinions
publisher Bucharest University of Economic Studies
series Juridical Tribune
issn 2247-7195
2248-0382
publishDate 2016-06-01
description In the present study we have examined the Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and the Council, the European legal instrument governing the right to interpretation and translation within criminal proceedings in the European Union. The innovations in this paper concern the examination of the regulatory way of the mentioned two rights, the formulated critical opinions and the proposals of de lege ferenda. The value of the paper lies in the de lege ferenda proposals, which that can contribute to improving the system of European legislation in the field, which in the constant interpretation of the ECHR it also requires respecting the right to interpretation and translation in ongoing criminal proceedings. Also, the examination highlights the importance and necessity of adopting this European legal instrument regarding the harmonization of the national laws in terms of compulsoriness and the procedure for complying with the two rights to which we referred, in case where the suspect or the accused is to be judged of the territory of a Member State other than his State of origin. The work can be useful to theorists, practitioners and to the European legislator from the perspective of operating the suggested changes.
topic suspect
accused
offense
criminal proceedings
the right to a fair trial
url http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An6v1/10%20Birzu.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdanbirzu therighttointerpretationandtranslationwithincriminalproceedingsintheeuropeanunioncomparativeexaminationcriticalopinions
AT bogdanbirzu righttointerpretationandtranslationwithincriminalproceedingsintheeuropeanunioncomparativeexaminationcriticalopinions
_version_ 1725945485603110912