Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’

Policy integration as the central theme of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda calls for more networks for linking actors and policies. The national coordinators of SDGs implementation have maintained a steering hierarchy that creatively engages the network of ministries to develop and i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan Wong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4498
id doaj-a6fd0bce8e104805a296f424db57022c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6fd0bce8e104805a296f424db57022c2020-11-25T00:28:02ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-08-011116449810.3390/su11164498su11164498Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’Ryan Wong0RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, AustraliaPolicy integration as the central theme of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda calls for more networks for linking actors and policies. The national coordinators of SDGs implementation have maintained a steering hierarchy that creatively engages the network of ministries to develop and implement the National Strategy on Sustainable Development. The integration literature presents a gap in understanding the internal fights of the bureaucrats behind the glossy policy documents. The study relied on 53 in-depth interviews and public documents from Finland, Germany and the Czech Republic to reveal how bureaucrats design institutions to <i>balance</i> the network, hierarchy and market features by maximising the strengths of each mode. The analysis aimed to reveal how &#8216;Networks Within Hierarchy&#8217; facilitates policy integration. It was found that the network deliberated slowly, rationally and personally. The supporting hierarchy provided direction, steered processes and finalised decisions, and the competitive market supplied choices of policy idea, killed bad ideas, and retained specialisation. When the network entered into endless debate, the coordinators forced a consensus through the hierarchy. Bureaucrats competed with each other in proposing better arguments for their ideas, lifting the quality of the deliberation and the consensus.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4498policy integrationpolicy coordinationnetworksustainable developmentcollaborationinstitutional design
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan Wong
spellingShingle Ryan Wong
Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’
Sustainability
policy integration
policy coordination
network
sustainable development
collaboration
institutional design
author_facet Ryan Wong
author_sort Ryan Wong
title Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’
title_short Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’
title_full Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’
title_fullStr Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’
title_full_unstemmed Balancing Institutions for Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals Through ‘Network Within Hierarchy’
title_sort balancing institutions for implementing the sustainable development goals through ‘network within hierarchy’
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Policy integration as the central theme of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) agenda calls for more networks for linking actors and policies. The national coordinators of SDGs implementation have maintained a steering hierarchy that creatively engages the network of ministries to develop and implement the National Strategy on Sustainable Development. The integration literature presents a gap in understanding the internal fights of the bureaucrats behind the glossy policy documents. The study relied on 53 in-depth interviews and public documents from Finland, Germany and the Czech Republic to reveal how bureaucrats design institutions to <i>balance</i> the network, hierarchy and market features by maximising the strengths of each mode. The analysis aimed to reveal how &#8216;Networks Within Hierarchy&#8217; facilitates policy integration. It was found that the network deliberated slowly, rationally and personally. The supporting hierarchy provided direction, steered processes and finalised decisions, and the competitive market supplied choices of policy idea, killed bad ideas, and retained specialisation. When the network entered into endless debate, the coordinators forced a consensus through the hierarchy. Bureaucrats competed with each other in proposing better arguments for their ideas, lifting the quality of the deliberation and the consensus.
topic policy integration
policy coordination
network
sustainable development
collaboration
institutional design
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4498
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanwong balancinginstitutionsforimplementingthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsthroughnetworkwithinhierarchy
_version_ 1725337225413001216