A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1

This paper accomplishes two related goals. Firstly, it presents version 1.1 of the Interstate War Data (IWD) data set. IWD is a data set of all interstate wars, using Correlates of War (COW) rules but improving on COW by repairing the high number of coding errors in COW and more accurately and preci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan Reiter, Allan C. Stam, Michael C. Horowitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-12-01
Series:Research & Politics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016683840
id doaj-a6f21f856dd441ed9e2815fb73ae11c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6f21f856dd441ed9e2815fb73ae11c72020-11-25T03:09:33ZengSAGE PublishingResearch & Politics2053-16802016-12-01310.1177/205316801668384010.1177_2053168016683840A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1Dan Reiter0Allan C. Stam1Michael C. Horowitz2Department of Political Science, Emory University, USAFrank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, USADepartment of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, USAThis paper accomplishes two related goals. Firstly, it presents version 1.1 of the Interstate War Data (IWD) data set. IWD is a data set of all interstate wars, using Correlates of War (COW) rules but improving on COW by repairing the high number of coding errors in COW and more accurately and precisely treating multilateral wars. IWD 1.1 makes important improvements over IWD 1.0, such as describing interstate wars and war participants previously neglected by COW and IWD 1.0 and extending the temporal range forward to 2013. It also is the first data set to provide a systematic list of all interstate wars back to 1816 with at least 500 battle deaths (COW and IWD 1.0 only listed those conflicts with at least 1000 battle deaths). Secondly, the paper discusses important issues in collecting data on interstate wars, especially collecting reliable data on battle dead. Battle dead data are critical both for constructing data sets and for testing hypotheses, but frequently battle dead estimates vary widely, and come from sources of varying quality. The paper discusses the importance of using reliable sources, and in particular of minimizing reliance on military encyclopedias.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016683840
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dan Reiter
Allan C. Stam
Michael C. Horowitz
spellingShingle Dan Reiter
Allan C. Stam
Michael C. Horowitz
A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1
Research & Politics
author_facet Dan Reiter
Allan C. Stam
Michael C. Horowitz
author_sort Dan Reiter
title A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1
title_short A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1
title_full A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1
title_fullStr A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1
title_full_unstemmed A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1
title_sort deeper look at interstate war data: interstate war data version 1.1
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Research & Politics
issn 2053-1680
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This paper accomplishes two related goals. Firstly, it presents version 1.1 of the Interstate War Data (IWD) data set. IWD is a data set of all interstate wars, using Correlates of War (COW) rules but improving on COW by repairing the high number of coding errors in COW and more accurately and precisely treating multilateral wars. IWD 1.1 makes important improvements over IWD 1.0, such as describing interstate wars and war participants previously neglected by COW and IWD 1.0 and extending the temporal range forward to 2013. It also is the first data set to provide a systematic list of all interstate wars back to 1816 with at least 500 battle deaths (COW and IWD 1.0 only listed those conflicts with at least 1000 battle deaths). Secondly, the paper discusses important issues in collecting data on interstate wars, especially collecting reliable data on battle dead. Battle dead data are critical both for constructing data sets and for testing hypotheses, but frequently battle dead estimates vary widely, and come from sources of varying quality. The paper discusses the importance of using reliable sources, and in particular of minimizing reliance on military encyclopedias.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016683840
work_keys_str_mv AT danreiter adeeperlookatinterstatewardatainterstatewardataversion11
AT allancstam adeeperlookatinterstatewardatainterstatewardataversion11
AT michaelchorowitz adeeperlookatinterstatewardatainterstatewardataversion11
AT danreiter deeperlookatinterstatewardatainterstatewardataversion11
AT allancstam deeperlookatinterstatewardatainterstatewardataversion11
AT michaelchorowitz deeperlookatinterstatewardatainterstatewardataversion11
_version_ 1724662017558577152