Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments
Conventional cross validation schemes for assessing transfer-function performance assume that observations are independent. In spatially structured environments this assumption is violated, resulting in over-optimistic estimates of transfer-function performance. <i>H</i>-block cross vali...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Climate of the Past |
Online Access: | http://www.clim-past.net/12/1215/2016/cp-12-1215-2016.pdf |
id |
doaj-a6e36508b5634599a69f645b02e582f8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a6e36508b5634599a69f645b02e582f82020-11-24T21:30:53ZengCopernicus PublicationsClimate of the Past1814-93241814-93322016-05-011251215122310.5194/cp-12-1215-2016Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environmentsM. Trachsel0R. J. Telford1Department of Biology, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Biology, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, NorwayConventional cross validation schemes for assessing transfer-function performance assume that observations are independent. In spatially structured environments this assumption is violated, resulting in over-optimistic estimates of transfer-function performance. <i>H</i>-block cross validation, where all samples within <i>h</i> kilometres of the test samples are omitted, is a method for obtaining unbiased transfer-function performance estimates. In this study, we assess three methods for determining the optimal <i>h</i>. Using simulated data, we find that all three methods result in comparable values of <i>h</i>. Applying the three methods to published transfer functions, we find they yield similar values for <i>h</i>. Some transfer functions perform notably worse when <i>h</i>-block cross validation is used.http://www.clim-past.net/12/1215/2016/cp-12-1215-2016.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. Trachsel R. J. Telford |
spellingShingle |
M. Trachsel R. J. Telford Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments Climate of the Past |
author_facet |
M. Trachsel R. J. Telford |
author_sort |
M. Trachsel |
title |
Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments |
title_short |
Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments |
title_full |
Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments |
title_fullStr |
Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technical note: Estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments |
title_sort |
technical note: estimating unbiased transfer-function performances in spatially structured environments |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Climate of the Past |
issn |
1814-9324 1814-9332 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
Conventional cross validation schemes for assessing transfer-function
performance assume that observations are independent. In spatially
structured environments this assumption is violated, resulting in
over-optimistic estimates of transfer-function performance. <i>H</i>-block
cross validation, where all samples within <i>h</i> kilometres of the test samples are
omitted, is a method for obtaining unbiased transfer-function performance
estimates. In this study, we assess three methods for determining the
optimal <i>h</i>. Using simulated data, we find that all three methods result in
comparable values of <i>h</i>. Applying the three methods to published transfer
functions, we find they yield similar values for <i>h</i>. Some transfer functions
perform notably worse when <i>h</i>-block cross validation is used. |
url |
http://www.clim-past.net/12/1215/2016/cp-12-1215-2016.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mtrachsel technicalnoteestimatingunbiasedtransferfunctionperformancesinspatiallystructuredenvironments AT rjtelford technicalnoteestimatingunbiasedtransferfunctionperformancesinspatiallystructuredenvironments |
_version_ |
1725961179865546752 |