Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation

Acoustic and Ultrasonic Methods for Particle Characterisation have many advantages. They are generally non-invasive, can be non-contact, are safe and often are economic. However, it can be difficult to interpret data, and the expertise and com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malcolm J. W. Povey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hosokawa Powder Technology Foundation 2014-03-01
Series:KONA Powder and Particle Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kona/24/0/24_2006015/_pdf/-char/en
id doaj-a6e0cb83b8f348c29263a372ba40e8a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6e0cb83b8f348c29263a372ba40e8a72021-02-03T01:05:21ZengHosokawa Powder Technology FoundationKONA Powder and Particle Journal0288-45342187-55372014-03-0124012613310.14356/kona.2006015konaAcoustic Methods for Particle CharacterisationMalcolm J. W. Povey0Procter Department of Food Science, The University of LeedsAcoustic and Ultrasonic Methods for Particle Characterisation have many advantages. They are generally non-invasive, can be non-contact, are safe and often are economic. However, it can be difficult to interpret data, and the expertise and commercial equipment necessary may be in short supply and inappropriate to commercial requirements. Nevertheless the potential for these techniques is immense, particularly with regard to the newly emerging field of nanotechnology. A less well-recognised but just as important requirement is the ability to characterise systems on length scales between the molecular and the macroscopic. It is not so well known that acoustics can provide information over a huge range of length scales, from a few nanometres (ultrasound spectrometry) up to geological scales. Commonsense approaches to the understanding of acoustics obscure the potential of the modality. Scattering theory underpins all the theory of acoustic propagation, and adopting this initially theoretical approach indicates a world of new information. At one level particles and structures may be sized, at another their molar compressibility obtained, at another their shape determined. Acoustic methods are complementary to light scattering techniques offering advantages where light scattering does not work? optically opaque systems, mixtures with small refractive index differences, for example. So ultrasound spectrometry is uniquely well-suited to the characterisation of nanoparticle concentrates. In this article the theory of ultrasound propagation is outlined simply for a general audience, emphasising those aspects which provide the greatest potential for adoption of the modality in the particle characterisation community and briefly describing the relevant current commercial and laboratory equipment.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kona/24/0/24_2006015/_pdf/-char/enacousticultrasoundstabilitysizesize distribution
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Malcolm J. W. Povey
spellingShingle Malcolm J. W. Povey
Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation
KONA Powder and Particle Journal
acoustic
ultrasound
stability
size
size distribution
author_facet Malcolm J. W. Povey
author_sort Malcolm J. W. Povey
title Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation
title_short Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation
title_full Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation
title_fullStr Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic Methods for Particle Characterisation
title_sort acoustic methods for particle characterisation
publisher Hosokawa Powder Technology Foundation
series KONA Powder and Particle Journal
issn 0288-4534
2187-5537
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Acoustic and Ultrasonic Methods for Particle Characterisation have many advantages. They are generally non-invasive, can be non-contact, are safe and often are economic. However, it can be difficult to interpret data, and the expertise and commercial equipment necessary may be in short supply and inappropriate to commercial requirements. Nevertheless the potential for these techniques is immense, particularly with regard to the newly emerging field of nanotechnology. A less well-recognised but just as important requirement is the ability to characterise systems on length scales between the molecular and the macroscopic. It is not so well known that acoustics can provide information over a huge range of length scales, from a few nanometres (ultrasound spectrometry) up to geological scales. Commonsense approaches to the understanding of acoustics obscure the potential of the modality. Scattering theory underpins all the theory of acoustic propagation, and adopting this initially theoretical approach indicates a world of new information. At one level particles and structures may be sized, at another their molar compressibility obtained, at another their shape determined. Acoustic methods are complementary to light scattering techniques offering advantages where light scattering does not work? optically opaque systems, mixtures with small refractive index differences, for example. So ultrasound spectrometry is uniquely well-suited to the characterisation of nanoparticle concentrates. In this article the theory of ultrasound propagation is outlined simply for a general audience, emphasising those aspects which provide the greatest potential for adoption of the modality in the particle characterisation community and briefly describing the relevant current commercial and laboratory equipment.
topic acoustic
ultrasound
stability
size
size distribution
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/kona/24/0/24_2006015/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT malcolmjwpovey acousticmethodsforparticlecharacterisation
_version_ 1724289935630925824