All-Out War

About 19 million students attend U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with a for-profit tax status educate 2 million of these students. Since the election of President Barack Obama in November 2008, media portrayals of for-profits have seen violent swings among neutral, positive, and eve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tim Gramling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-06-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011414732
id doaj-a6d3495fa03e4fefa9f746c4094ab442
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6d3495fa03e4fefa9f746c4094ab4422020-11-25T02:37:06ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402011-06-01110.1177/215824401141473210.1177_2158244011414732All-Out WarTim Gramling0Colorado Technical University Kansas City, North Kansas City, MO, USAAbout 19 million students attend U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with a for-profit tax status educate 2 million of these students. Since the election of President Barack Obama in November 2008, media portrayals of for-profits have seen violent swings among neutral, positive, and even intensely negative views. Two sets of forces have been at work behind the scenes. First is the U.S. government, including the U.S. Senate, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Second are the for-profit institutions themselves. This case study explores how these forces drove dramatic media coverage shifts in the first two years of the Obama administration.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011414732
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tim Gramling
spellingShingle Tim Gramling
All-Out War
SAGE Open
author_facet Tim Gramling
author_sort Tim Gramling
title All-Out War
title_short All-Out War
title_full All-Out War
title_fullStr All-Out War
title_full_unstemmed All-Out War
title_sort all-out war
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2011-06-01
description About 19 million students attend U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with a for-profit tax status educate 2 million of these students. Since the election of President Barack Obama in November 2008, media portrayals of for-profits have seen violent swings among neutral, positive, and even intensely negative views. Two sets of forces have been at work behind the scenes. First is the U.S. government, including the U.S. Senate, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Second are the for-profit institutions themselves. This case study explores how these forces drove dramatic media coverage shifts in the first two years of the Obama administration.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011414732
work_keys_str_mv AT timgramling alloutwar
_version_ 1724796660678131712