All-Out War
About 19 million students attend U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with a for-profit tax status educate 2 million of these students. Since the election of President Barack Obama in November 2008, media portrayals of for-profits have seen violent swings among neutral, positive, and eve...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2011-06-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011414732 |
id |
doaj-a6d3495fa03e4fefa9f746c4094ab442 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a6d3495fa03e4fefa9f746c4094ab4422020-11-25T02:37:06ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402011-06-01110.1177/215824401141473210.1177_2158244011414732All-Out WarTim Gramling0Colorado Technical University Kansas City, North Kansas City, MO, USAAbout 19 million students attend U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with a for-profit tax status educate 2 million of these students. Since the election of President Barack Obama in November 2008, media portrayals of for-profits have seen violent swings among neutral, positive, and even intensely negative views. Two sets of forces have been at work behind the scenes. First is the U.S. government, including the U.S. Senate, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Second are the for-profit institutions themselves. This case study explores how these forces drove dramatic media coverage shifts in the first two years of the Obama administration.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011414732 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tim Gramling |
spellingShingle |
Tim Gramling All-Out War SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Tim Gramling |
author_sort |
Tim Gramling |
title |
All-Out War |
title_short |
All-Out War |
title_full |
All-Out War |
title_fullStr |
All-Out War |
title_full_unstemmed |
All-Out War |
title_sort |
all-out war |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
About 19 million students attend U.S. higher education institutions. Institutions with a for-profit tax status educate 2 million of these students. Since the election of President Barack Obama in November 2008, media portrayals of for-profits have seen violent swings among neutral, positive, and even intensely negative views. Two sets of forces have been at work behind the scenes. First is the U.S. government, including the U.S. Senate, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Government Accountability Office. Second are the for-profit institutions themselves. This case study explores how these forces drove dramatic media coverage shifts in the first two years of the Obama administration. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244011414732 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT timgramling alloutwar |
_version_ |
1724796660678131712 |