New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure

Recent developments in network theory have led to the creation of new models to describe spatial and social interaction and a reappraisal of existing models. Although designed with contemporary society in mind they are increasingly used by archaeologists to help explain the archaeological record. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raymond J. Rivers, Timothy S. Evans
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme 2014-03-01
Series:Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/nda/2316
id doaj-a6b9f277a5284bb7913fd7b9d34c9b07
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6b9f277a5284bb7913fd7b9d34c9b072020-11-25T00:19:15ZfraEditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'HommeLes Nouvelles de l’Archéologie0242-77022425-19412014-03-01135212710.4000/nda.2316New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structureRaymond J. RiversTimothy S. EvansRecent developments in network theory have led to the creation of new models to describe spatial and social interaction and a reappraisal of existing models. Although designed with contemporary society in mind they are increasingly used by archaeologists to help explain the archaeological record. This leads to the problem that, with such a large range of models available it is likely that, if we hunt hard enough, we can find a model to justify whatever preconceptions we may have. In this paper we address this issue by re-examining the onset of centralisation in mainland Greek city states of the 9th and 8th centuries BCE. Pioneering work on this settlement structure was performed in 1987 by Rihll and Wilson, adapting a 'retail' model devised originally for 20th century urban planning. We highlight the problems of modelling archaeological data by contrasting this model to a recent cost-benefit model termed ariadne, developed by ourselves, and other simpler models. In particular, we examine what constitutes model 'robustness' and the way in which different models handle 'contingency' when describing periods of rapid change. In no way can we get what we want.http://journals.openedition.org/nda/2316ariadnecity statecost-benefit modelGrece
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raymond J. Rivers
Timothy S. Evans
spellingShingle Raymond J. Rivers
Timothy S. Evans
New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure
Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
ariadne
city state
cost-benefit model
Grece
author_facet Raymond J. Rivers
Timothy S. Evans
author_sort Raymond J. Rivers
title New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure
title_short New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure
title_full New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure
title_fullStr New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure
title_full_unstemmed New approaches to Archaic Greek settlement structure
title_sort new approaches to archaic greek settlement structure
publisher Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
series Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
issn 0242-7702
2425-1941
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Recent developments in network theory have led to the creation of new models to describe spatial and social interaction and a reappraisal of existing models. Although designed with contemporary society in mind they are increasingly used by archaeologists to help explain the archaeological record. This leads to the problem that, with such a large range of models available it is likely that, if we hunt hard enough, we can find a model to justify whatever preconceptions we may have. In this paper we address this issue by re-examining the onset of centralisation in mainland Greek city states of the 9th and 8th centuries BCE. Pioneering work on this settlement structure was performed in 1987 by Rihll and Wilson, adapting a 'retail' model devised originally for 20th century urban planning. We highlight the problems of modelling archaeological data by contrasting this model to a recent cost-benefit model termed ariadne, developed by ourselves, and other simpler models. In particular, we examine what constitutes model 'robustness' and the way in which different models handle 'contingency' when describing periods of rapid change. In no way can we get what we want.
topic ariadne
city state
cost-benefit model
Grece
url http://journals.openedition.org/nda/2316
work_keys_str_mv AT raymondjrivers newapproachestoarchaicgreeksettlementstructure
AT timothysevans newapproachestoarchaicgreeksettlementstructure
_version_ 1725372322400960512