A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking

Dual-Process theories have been suggested by psychologists, covering multiple aspects of human information processing such as deductive reasoning, problem-solving and decision making. Cognitive-Experiential Self Theory is a Dual-Process Model of cognition, advocating that individuals’ behaviour is d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Penelope Louka, Vasiliki Apeiranthitou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: InterOPTICS 2020-11-01
Series:Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.obrela-journal.gr/index.php/obrela/article/view/142
id doaj-a6a82041f85d413ead3e96f56cc7bb4d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6a82041f85d413ead3e96f56cc7bb4d2020-11-30T18:45:28ZengInterOPTICSDialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health2585-27952020-11-013421122810.26386/obrela.v3i4.142142A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of ThinkingPenelope LoukaVasiliki ApeiranthitouDual-Process theories have been suggested by psychologists, covering multiple aspects of human information processing such as deductive reasoning, problem-solving and decision making. Cognitive-Experiential Self Theory is a Dual-Process Model of cognition, advocating that individuals’ behaviour is determined by two distinct information processing systems (the Rational and Experiential one), which operate different functions. The aim of this research was to examine the predictive functional relationship between Analytic Cognitive Ability, Working Memory Capacity, Logical Deduction Problem-Solving Ability, Counterfactual Thinking Ability, Emotional Expressiveness and Actively Open-Minded Thinking Disposition on individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking. A wide range of assessment strategy tasks was employed to explore multiple aspects of human information processing through a correlational design on a recruited sample of 258 participants. A binominal logistic regression statistical analysis was used, and the results revealed that all the predictor variables explained a small yet statistically significant amount of the variance of Style of Thinking. In particular, the Model accounted for between 10% and 13% of the variance in Style of Thinking, with 68.3% of those having Rational Style of Thinking being correctly predicted while 58.6% of those having Experiential Style of Thinking being also correctly predicted, and 63.9% overall. Despite the minimal practicality of the proposed Model, which was due to the small variance indicated by the predictor variables, it follows a methodological design originating from the Dual-Process Theory, that could be further exploited in future studies. With regards to the transitivity of preference, it is crucial to devise models to demonstrate how these two systems may interact in the human brain and how their competition and conflict could be resolved for the sake of self-control behaviour.https://www.obrela-journal.gr/index.php/obrela/article/view/142dual-process theoriescognitive-experiential self theoryrational style of thinkingexperiential style of thinking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Penelope Louka
Vasiliki Apeiranthitou
spellingShingle Penelope Louka
Vasiliki Apeiranthitou
A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health
dual-process theories
cognitive-experiential self theory
rational style of thinking
experiential style of thinking
author_facet Penelope Louka
Vasiliki Apeiranthitou
author_sort Penelope Louka
title A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking
title_short A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking
title_full A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking
title_fullStr A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking
title_full_unstemmed A Cognitive Architecture founded on Dual-Process Theory predicts individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking
title_sort cognitive architecture founded on dual-process theory predicts individuals’ potential for rational or experiential style of thinking
publisher InterOPTICS
series Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health
issn 2585-2795
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Dual-Process theories have been suggested by psychologists, covering multiple aspects of human information processing such as deductive reasoning, problem-solving and decision making. Cognitive-Experiential Self Theory is a Dual-Process Model of cognition, advocating that individuals’ behaviour is determined by two distinct information processing systems (the Rational and Experiential one), which operate different functions. The aim of this research was to examine the predictive functional relationship between Analytic Cognitive Ability, Working Memory Capacity, Logical Deduction Problem-Solving Ability, Counterfactual Thinking Ability, Emotional Expressiveness and Actively Open-Minded Thinking Disposition on individuals’ potential for Rational or Experiential Style of Thinking. A wide range of assessment strategy tasks was employed to explore multiple aspects of human information processing through a correlational design on a recruited sample of 258 participants. A binominal logistic regression statistical analysis was used, and the results revealed that all the predictor variables explained a small yet statistically significant amount of the variance of Style of Thinking. In particular, the Model accounted for between 10% and 13% of the variance in Style of Thinking, with 68.3% of those having Rational Style of Thinking being correctly predicted while 58.6% of those having Experiential Style of Thinking being also correctly predicted, and 63.9% overall. Despite the minimal practicality of the proposed Model, which was due to the small variance indicated by the predictor variables, it follows a methodological design originating from the Dual-Process Theory, that could be further exploited in future studies. With regards to the transitivity of preference, it is crucial to devise models to demonstrate how these two systems may interact in the human brain and how their competition and conflict could be resolved for the sake of self-control behaviour.
topic dual-process theories
cognitive-experiential self theory
rational style of thinking
experiential style of thinking
url https://www.obrela-journal.gr/index.php/obrela/article/view/142
work_keys_str_mv AT penelopelouka acognitivearchitecturefoundedondualprocesstheorypredictsindividualspotentialforrationalorexperientialstyleofthinking
AT vasilikiapeiranthitou acognitivearchitecturefoundedondualprocesstheorypredictsindividualspotentialforrationalorexperientialstyleofthinking
AT penelopelouka cognitivearchitecturefoundedondualprocesstheorypredictsindividualspotentialforrationalorexperientialstyleofthinking
AT vasilikiapeiranthitou cognitivearchitecturefoundedondualprocesstheorypredictsindividualspotentialforrationalorexperientialstyleofthinking
_version_ 1724411442789089280