The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed

Various models of Dynamic Assessment (DA) have been used in L2 pragmatic instruction and have proved their significant contributions to pragmatic production; however, there is a paucity of research regarding their implementation for pragmatic comprehension. Therefore, this study sought to investigat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali Malmir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press 2020-06-01
Series:Issues in Language Teaching
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_11831_520051cde9ab69053732bda61e7834dc.pdf
id doaj-a69c67cb520c4a0fb8d35b02dd81ebb4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a69c67cb520c4a0fb8d35b02dd81ebb42020-11-25T04:07:03ZengAllameh Tabataba'i University PressIssues in Language Teaching2322-37152476-61942020-06-019127932010.22054/ilt.2020.53398.51511831The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and SpeedAli Malmir0Assistant Professor of Applied Linguistics at Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, IranVarious models of Dynamic Assessment (DA) have been used in L2 pragmatic instruction and have proved their significant contributions to pragmatic production; however, there is a paucity of research regarding their implementation for pragmatic comprehension. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the effects of interactionist and interventionist models of DA on the accuracy and speed of pragmatic comprehension among a convenience sample of 60 advanced EFL learners who were randomly assigned into two DA groups and a control group. A listening pragmatic comprehension test developed and validated by Garcia (2004) was used both as a pretest and as a posttest. During the 14-session treatment, the interactionist DA group received metapragmatic instruction about 28 conversations, and learners interacted with each other and the teacher. Assistance and scaffolding were continuously provided by the teacher as the more knowledgeable other (MKO) within the learners’ Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). The interventionist DA class received its treatment based on DA procedures as presented by Lantolf and Poehner (2010). However, the Non-DA group only received metapragmatic instruction about the conversations from the instructor without any DA-based intervention or interaction. Data analysis using one-way ANCOVA revealed that study groups differed in their pragmatic comprehension accuracy and speed: DA groups significantly outperformed the control group. The interventionist DA group did significantly better than the interactionist DA group for pragmatic accuracy but nor for pragmatic comprehension speed. The pedagogical implication of the study is that teachers can utilize interventionist and interactionist DA to foster learners’ pragmatic comprehension accuracy.https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_11831_520051cde9ab69053732bda61e7834dc.pdfdynamic assessmentinteractionist dainterventions dapragmatic comprehension accuracypragmatic comprehension speed
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Malmir
spellingShingle Ali Malmir
The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed
Issues in Language Teaching
dynamic assessment
interactionist da
interventions da
pragmatic comprehension accuracy
pragmatic comprehension speed
author_facet Ali Malmir
author_sort Ali Malmir
title The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed
title_short The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed
title_full The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed
title_fullStr The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Interactionist vs. Interventionist Models of Dynamic Assessment on L2 Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension Accuracy and Speed
title_sort effect of interactionist vs. interventionist models of dynamic assessment on l2 learners’ pragmatic comprehension accuracy and speed
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
series Issues in Language Teaching
issn 2322-3715
2476-6194
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Various models of Dynamic Assessment (DA) have been used in L2 pragmatic instruction and have proved their significant contributions to pragmatic production; however, there is a paucity of research regarding their implementation for pragmatic comprehension. Therefore, this study sought to investigate the effects of interactionist and interventionist models of DA on the accuracy and speed of pragmatic comprehension among a convenience sample of 60 advanced EFL learners who were randomly assigned into two DA groups and a control group. A listening pragmatic comprehension test developed and validated by Garcia (2004) was used both as a pretest and as a posttest. During the 14-session treatment, the interactionist DA group received metapragmatic instruction about 28 conversations, and learners interacted with each other and the teacher. Assistance and scaffolding were continuously provided by the teacher as the more knowledgeable other (MKO) within the learners’ Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). The interventionist DA class received its treatment based on DA procedures as presented by Lantolf and Poehner (2010). However, the Non-DA group only received metapragmatic instruction about the conversations from the instructor without any DA-based intervention or interaction. Data analysis using one-way ANCOVA revealed that study groups differed in their pragmatic comprehension accuracy and speed: DA groups significantly outperformed the control group. The interventionist DA group did significantly better than the interactionist DA group for pragmatic accuracy but nor for pragmatic comprehension speed. The pedagogical implication of the study is that teachers can utilize interventionist and interactionist DA to foster learners’ pragmatic comprehension accuracy.
topic dynamic assessment
interactionist da
interventions da
pragmatic comprehension accuracy
pragmatic comprehension speed
url https://ilt.atu.ac.ir/article_11831_520051cde9ab69053732bda61e7834dc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alimalmir theeffectofinteractionistvsinterventionistmodelsofdynamicassessmentonl2learnerspragmaticcomprehensionaccuracyandspeed
AT alimalmir effectofinteractionistvsinterventionistmodelsofdynamicassessmentonl2learnerspragmaticcomprehensionaccuracyandspeed
_version_ 1724429671045529600