Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows

The central theme of this paper is the scientific viewpoint taken for understanding behavioral processes. Two classical viewpoints are formulated by Dennett (the intentional stance) and Tinbergen (Tinbergen's four questions). In this paper we argue that the two different viewpoints are linked t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frans Blommaert, Ruud Janssen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2005-01-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490500300113
id doaj-a6788ace1eeb479cb7b9fec4aedafcc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6788ace1eeb479cb7b9fec4aedafcc32020-11-25T02:59:27ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492005-01-01310.1177/14747049050030011310.1177_147470490500300113Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner CrowsFrans BlommaertRuud JanssenThe central theme of this paper is the scientific viewpoint taken for understanding behavioral processes. Two classical viewpoints are formulated by Dennett (the intentional stance) and Tinbergen (Tinbergen's four questions). In this paper we argue that the two different viewpoints are linked to the two different processes that underlie complex behavior, namely, the instruction process and the selection process. To zoom in on the similarities and differences between these processes, we model whelk dropping behavior of Northwestern crows as observed by Zach (1978, 1979) from the two different viewpoints: (1) with crows that possess intentional faculties (called Dennett crows), and (2) with crows that possess selectional faculties. The latter type of crows is further divided into a population that is able to adapt over generations only by natural selection (Darwin crows), and a population that, apart from natural selection, is also able to adapt using operant learning (Skinner crows). Salient outcomes are that these two populations need markedly different times to adapt to changes in the environment, and that operant learning needs a value system that is an internal equivalent of the fitness criterion. In conclusion, we propose that understanding behavior should start at a meta-level with identifying whether the nature of the behavioral process under study is intentional or selectional.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490500300113
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frans Blommaert
Ruud Janssen
spellingShingle Frans Blommaert
Ruud Janssen
Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows
Evolutionary Psychology
author_facet Frans Blommaert
Ruud Janssen
author_sort Frans Blommaert
title Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows
title_short Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows
title_full Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows
title_fullStr Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows
title_full_unstemmed Dennett, Darwin, and Skinner Crows
title_sort dennett, darwin, and skinner crows
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Evolutionary Psychology
issn 1474-7049
publishDate 2005-01-01
description The central theme of this paper is the scientific viewpoint taken for understanding behavioral processes. Two classical viewpoints are formulated by Dennett (the intentional stance) and Tinbergen (Tinbergen's four questions). In this paper we argue that the two different viewpoints are linked to the two different processes that underlie complex behavior, namely, the instruction process and the selection process. To zoom in on the similarities and differences between these processes, we model whelk dropping behavior of Northwestern crows as observed by Zach (1978, 1979) from the two different viewpoints: (1) with crows that possess intentional faculties (called Dennett crows), and (2) with crows that possess selectional faculties. The latter type of crows is further divided into a population that is able to adapt over generations only by natural selection (Darwin crows), and a population that, apart from natural selection, is also able to adapt using operant learning (Skinner crows). Salient outcomes are that these two populations need markedly different times to adapt to changes in the environment, and that operant learning needs a value system that is an internal equivalent of the fitness criterion. In conclusion, we propose that understanding behavior should start at a meta-level with identifying whether the nature of the behavioral process under study is intentional or selectional.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490500300113
work_keys_str_mv AT fransblommaert dennettdarwinandskinnercrows
AT ruudjanssen dennettdarwinandskinnercrows
_version_ 1724702359066509312