Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks

Abstract Community or module structure is a natural property of complex networks. Leader communities and self-organizing communities have been introduced recently to characterize networks and understand how communities arise in complex networks. However, identification of leader and self-organizing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingcheng Fu, Weixiong Zhang, Jianliang Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00718-3
id doaj-a6744232329c406d84c4a52cd4a92ac7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6744232329c406d84c4a52cd4a92ac72020-12-08T02:09:50ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-04-017111010.1038/s41598-017-00718-3Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networksJingcheng Fu0Weixiong Zhang1Jianliang Wu2School of Mathematics, Shandong UniversityCollege of Math and Computer Science, Institute for Systems Biology, Jianghan UniversitySchool of Mathematics, Shandong UniversityAbstract Community or module structure is a natural property of complex networks. Leader communities and self-organizing communities have been introduced recently to characterize networks and understand how communities arise in complex networks. However, identification of leader and self-organizing communities is technically challenging since no adequate quantification has been developed to properly separate the two types of communities. We introduced a new measure, called ratio of node degree variances, to distinguish leader communities from self-organizing communities, and developed a statistical model to quantitatively characterize the two types of communities. We experimentally studied the power and robustness of the new method on several real-world networks in combination of some of the existing community identification methods. Our results revealed that social networks and citation networks contain more leader communities whereas technological networks such as power grid network have more self-organizing communities. Moreover, our results also indicated that self-organizing communities tend to be smaller than leader communities. The results shed new lights on community formation and module structures in complex systems.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00718-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingcheng Fu
Weixiong Zhang
Jianliang Wu
spellingShingle Jingcheng Fu
Weixiong Zhang
Jianliang Wu
Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
Scientific Reports
author_facet Jingcheng Fu
Weixiong Zhang
Jianliang Wu
author_sort Jingcheng Fu
title Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
title_short Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
title_full Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
title_fullStr Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
title_full_unstemmed Identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
title_sort identification of leader and self-organizing communities in complex networks
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Community or module structure is a natural property of complex networks. Leader communities and self-organizing communities have been introduced recently to characterize networks and understand how communities arise in complex networks. However, identification of leader and self-organizing communities is technically challenging since no adequate quantification has been developed to properly separate the two types of communities. We introduced a new measure, called ratio of node degree variances, to distinguish leader communities from self-organizing communities, and developed a statistical model to quantitatively characterize the two types of communities. We experimentally studied the power and robustness of the new method on several real-world networks in combination of some of the existing community identification methods. Our results revealed that social networks and citation networks contain more leader communities whereas technological networks such as power grid network have more self-organizing communities. Moreover, our results also indicated that self-organizing communities tend to be smaller than leader communities. The results shed new lights on community formation and module structures in complex systems.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00718-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jingchengfu identificationofleaderandselforganizingcommunitiesincomplexnetworks
AT weixiongzhang identificationofleaderandselforganizingcommunitiesincomplexnetworks
AT jianliangwu identificationofleaderandselforganizingcommunitiesincomplexnetworks
_version_ 1724394079087755264