Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
Background: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2020-06-01
|
Series: | African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212 |
id |
doaj-a63f4087a7924c6a9f7c6d805e82c232 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a63f4087a7924c6a9f7c6d805e82c2322020-11-25T03:07:18ZengAOSISAfrican Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine2071-29282071-29362020-06-01121e1e810.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2212735Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern NigeriaOluwagbenga Ogunfowokan0Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan1Anthony I. Nwajei2Lincoln University College, SelangorThe Ark Medical Centre, AsabaFederal Medical Centre, AsabaBackground: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT CareStatTM with microscopy. Setting: This study was conducted in the paediatric primary care clinic of the Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study for diagnostic accuracy was conducted from May 2016 to October 2016. Ninety-eight participants were involved to obtain a precision of 5%, sensitivity of mRDT CareStatTM of 95% from published work and 95% level of confidence after adjusting for 20% non-response rate or missing data. Consecutive participants were tested using both microscopy and mRDT. The results were analysed using EPI Info Version 7. Results: A total of 98 children aged 3–59 months were enrolled. Malaria prevalence was found to be 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46% – 60%), whilst sensitivity and specificity were 29% (95% CI = 20% – 38%) and 89% (95% CI = 83% – 95%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 75% (95% CI = 66.4% – 83.6%) and 53% (95% CI = 46% – 60%), respectively. Conclusion: Agreement between malaria parasitaemia using microscopy and mRDT positivity increased with increase in the parasite density. The mRDT might be negative when malaria parasite density using microscopy is low.https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212family medicineprimary careeducationmrdtparasite densitysensitivityspecificity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan Anthony I. Nwajei |
spellingShingle |
Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan Anthony I. Nwajei Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine family medicine primary care education mrdt parasite density sensitivity specificity |
author_facet |
Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan Anthony I. Nwajei |
author_sort |
Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan |
title |
Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria |
title_short |
Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria |
title_full |
Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria |
title_fullStr |
Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria |
title_sort |
sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mrdt carestattm) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern nigeria |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine |
issn |
2071-2928 2071-2936 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Background: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy.
Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT CareStatTM with microscopy.
Setting: This study was conducted in the paediatric primary care clinic of the Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria.
Methods: A cross-sectional study for diagnostic accuracy was conducted from May 2016 to October 2016. Ninety-eight participants were involved to obtain a precision of 5%, sensitivity of mRDT CareStatTM of 95% from published work and 95% level of confidence after adjusting for 20% non-response rate or missing data. Consecutive participants were tested using both microscopy and mRDT. The results were analysed using EPI Info Version 7.
Results: A total of 98 children aged 3–59 months were enrolled. Malaria prevalence was found to be 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46% – 60%), whilst sensitivity and specificity were 29% (95% CI = 20% – 38%) and 89% (95% CI = 83% – 95%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 75% (95% CI = 66.4% – 83.6%) and 53% (95% CI = 46% – 60%), respectively.
Conclusion: Agreement between malaria parasitaemia using microscopy and mRDT positivity increased with increase in the parasite density. The mRDT might be negative when malaria parasite density using microscopy is low. |
topic |
family medicine primary care education mrdt parasite density sensitivity specificity |
url |
https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oluwagbengaogunfowokan sensitivityandspecificityofmalariarapiddiagnostictestmrdtcarestattmcomparedwithmicroscopyamongstunderfivechildrenattendingaprimarycareclinicinsouthernnigeria AT bamideleaogunfowokan sensitivityandspecificityofmalariarapiddiagnostictestmrdtcarestattmcomparedwithmicroscopyamongstunderfivechildrenattendingaprimarycareclinicinsouthernnigeria AT anthonyinwajei sensitivityandspecificityofmalariarapiddiagnostictestmrdtcarestattmcomparedwithmicroscopyamongstunderfivechildrenattendingaprimarycareclinicinsouthernnigeria |
_version_ |
1724671342664482816 |