Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria

Background: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan, Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan, Anthony I. Nwajei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2020-06-01
Series:African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212
id doaj-a63f4087a7924c6a9f7c6d805e82c232
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a63f4087a7924c6a9f7c6d805e82c2322020-11-25T03:07:18ZengAOSISAfrican Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine2071-29282071-29362020-06-01121e1e810.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2212735Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern NigeriaOluwagbenga Ogunfowokan0Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan1Anthony I. Nwajei2Lincoln University College, SelangorThe Ark Medical Centre, AsabaFederal Medical Centre, AsabaBackground: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT CareStatTM with microscopy. Setting: This study was conducted in the paediatric primary care clinic of the Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study for diagnostic accuracy was conducted from May 2016 to October 2016. Ninety-eight participants were involved to obtain a precision of 5%, sensitivity of mRDT CareStatTM of 95% from published work and 95% level of confidence after adjusting for 20% non-response rate or missing data. Consecutive participants were tested using both microscopy and mRDT. The results were analysed using EPI Info Version 7. Results: A total of 98 children aged 3–59 months were enrolled. Malaria prevalence was found to be 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46% – 60%), whilst sensitivity and specificity were 29% (95% CI = 20% – 38%) and 89% (95% CI = 83% – 95%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 75% (95% CI = 66.4% – 83.6%) and 53% (95% CI = 46% – 60%), respectively. Conclusion: Agreement between malaria parasitaemia using microscopy and mRDT positivity increased with increase in the parasite density. The mRDT might be negative when malaria parasite density using microscopy is low.https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212family medicineprimary careeducationmrdtparasite densitysensitivityspecificity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan
Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan
Anthony I. Nwajei
spellingShingle Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan
Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan
Anthony I. Nwajei
Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
family medicine
primary care
education
mrdt
parasite density
sensitivity
specificity
author_facet Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan
Bamidele A. Ogunfowokan
Anthony I. Nwajei
author_sort Oluwagbenga Ogunfowokan
title Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT CareStatTM) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern Nigeria
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mrdt carestattm) compared with microscopy amongst under five children attending a primary care clinic in southern nigeria
publisher AOSIS
series African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine
issn 2071-2928
2071-2936
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background: Malaria diagnosis using microscopy is currently the gold standard. However, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) were developed to simplify the diagnosis in regions without access to functional microscopy. Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of mRDT CareStatTM with microscopy. Setting: This study was conducted in the paediatric primary care clinic of the Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study for diagnostic accuracy was conducted from May 2016 to October 2016. Ninety-eight participants were involved to obtain a precision of 5%, sensitivity of mRDT CareStatTM of 95% from published work and 95% level of confidence after adjusting for 20% non-response rate or missing data. Consecutive participants were tested using both microscopy and mRDT. The results were analysed using EPI Info Version 7. Results: A total of 98 children aged 3–59 months were enrolled. Malaria prevalence was found to be 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46% – 60%), whilst sensitivity and specificity were 29% (95% CI = 20% – 38%) and 89% (95% CI = 83% – 95%), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 75% (95% CI = 66.4% – 83.6%) and 53% (95% CI = 46% – 60%), respectively. Conclusion: Agreement between malaria parasitaemia using microscopy and mRDT positivity increased with increase in the parasite density. The mRDT might be negative when malaria parasite density using microscopy is low.
topic family medicine
primary care
education
mrdt
parasite density
sensitivity
specificity
url https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm/article/view/2212
work_keys_str_mv AT oluwagbengaogunfowokan sensitivityandspecificityofmalariarapiddiagnostictestmrdtcarestattmcomparedwithmicroscopyamongstunderfivechildrenattendingaprimarycareclinicinsouthernnigeria
AT bamideleaogunfowokan sensitivityandspecificityofmalariarapiddiagnostictestmrdtcarestattmcomparedwithmicroscopyamongstunderfivechildrenattendingaprimarycareclinicinsouthernnigeria
AT anthonyinwajei sensitivityandspecificityofmalariarapiddiagnostictestmrdtcarestattmcomparedwithmicroscopyamongstunderfivechildrenattendingaprimarycareclinicinsouthernnigeria
_version_ 1724671342664482816