Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia

Ahmed M Emarah, Mostafa A El-Helw, Hazem M YassinCairo University, Cairo, EgyptAim: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia.Patients and methods: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed M Emarah, Mostafa A El-Helw, Hazem M Yassin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2010-05-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-clear-lens-extraction-and-collamer-lens-implantation-in--a4406
id doaj-a62b5933b1ce41e4936e48cde02e0701
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a62b5933b1ce41e4936e48cde02e07012020-11-24T23:36:49ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54671177-54832010-05-012010default447454Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopiaAhmed M EmarahMostafa A El-HelwHazem M YassinAhmed M Emarah, Mostafa A El-Helw, Hazem M YassinCairo University, Cairo, EgyptAim: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia.Patients and methods: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised patients undergoing clear lens extraction and Group 2 patients received the Visian implantable collamer lens. Outcome and complications were evaluated.Results: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was -0.61 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.79 ± 0.16 in Group 2. In Group 1, 71.4% achieved a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity better than the preoperative best corrected visual acuity, while only 51.8% patients achieved this in Group 2. Intraocular pressure decreased by 12.55% in Group 1, and increased by 15.11% in Group 2. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased by 4.47% in Group 1 and decreased by 5.67% in Group 2. Posterior capsule opacification occurred in Group 1. In Group 2, lens opacification occurred in 11.11%, significant pigment dispersion in 3.7%, and pupillary block glaucoma in 3.7%.Conclusion: Clear lens extraction presents less of a financial load up front, and less likelihood of the need for a secondary intervention in the future. Clear lens extraction is a more viable solution in developing countries with limited financial resources.Keywords: clear lens extraction, implantable collamer lens, myopia http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-clear-lens-extraction-and-collamer-lens-implantation-in--a4406
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed M Emarah
Mostafa A El-Helw
Hazem M Yassin
spellingShingle Ahmed M Emarah
Mostafa A El-Helw
Hazem M Yassin
Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Ahmed M Emarah
Mostafa A El-Helw
Hazem M Yassin
author_sort Ahmed M Emarah
title Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_short Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_full Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_fullStr Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
title_sort comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5467
1177-5483
publishDate 2010-05-01
description Ahmed M Emarah, Mostafa A El-Helw, Hazem M YassinCairo University, Cairo, EgyptAim: To compare the outcomes of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia.Patients and methods: Myopic patients younger than 40 years old with more than 12 diopters of myopia or who were not fit for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis were included. Group 1 comprised patients undergoing clear lens extraction and Group 2 patients received the Visian implantable collamer lens. Outcome and complications were evaluated.Results: Postoperative best corrected visual acuity was -0.61 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.79 ± 0.16 in Group 2. In Group 1, 71.4% achieved a postoperative uncorrected visual acuity better than the preoperative best corrected visual acuity, while only 51.8% patients achieved this in Group 2. Intraocular pressure decreased by 12.55% in Group 1, and increased by 15.11% in Group 2. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased by 4.47% in Group 1 and decreased by 5.67% in Group 2. Posterior capsule opacification occurred in Group 1. In Group 2, lens opacification occurred in 11.11%, significant pigment dispersion in 3.7%, and pupillary block glaucoma in 3.7%.Conclusion: Clear lens extraction presents less of a financial load up front, and less likelihood of the need for a secondary intervention in the future. Clear lens extraction is a more viable solution in developing countries with limited financial resources.Keywords: clear lens extraction, implantable collamer lens, myopia
url http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-clear-lens-extraction-and-collamer-lens-implantation-in--a4406
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmemarah comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia
AT mostafaaelhelw comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia
AT hazemmyassin comparisonofclearlensextractionandcollamerlensimplantationinhighmyopia
_version_ 1725521411019112448