Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight
<p>The establishment of dominance patterns does not automatically yield insights into the history of accentual paradigms. As in the case of segmental features, it is necessary first to identify the results of analogical developments and to separate them from the original regularities. Both apo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Vilnius University
2012-12-01
|
| Series: | Baltistica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2155 |
| id |
doaj-a62a715977784c00a9855bc6e82bac48 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-a62a715977784c00a9855bc6e82bac482020-11-24T22:34:41ZdeuVilnius UniversityBaltistica0132-65032345-00452012-12-0147225525910.15388/baltistica.47.2.21552042Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insightFrederik Kortlandt<p>The establishment of dominance patterns does not automatically yield insights into the history of accentual paradigms. As in the case of segmental features, it is necessary first to identify the results of analogical developments and to separate them from the original regularities. Both apophony and metatony became highly productive in Latvian and Lithuanian word formation, leading to complex morphonological relationships.</p>http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2155dominancehistorical accentologyaccentuationmonophtongizationhistorical phonologyLithuanianBaltio-Slavic |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
deu |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Frederik Kortlandt |
| spellingShingle |
Frederik Kortlandt Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight Baltistica dominance historical accentology accentuation monophtongization historical phonology Lithuanian Baltio-Slavic |
| author_facet |
Frederik Kortlandt |
| author_sort |
Frederik Kortlandt |
| title |
Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight |
| title_short |
Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight |
| title_full |
Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight |
| title_fullStr |
Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight |
| title_sort |
dominance and monophthongization: method versus insight |
| publisher |
Vilnius University |
| series |
Baltistica |
| issn |
0132-6503 2345-0045 |
| publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
| description |
<p>The establishment of dominance patterns does not automatically yield insights into the history of accentual paradigms. As in the case of segmental features, it is necessary first to identify the results of analogical developments and to separate them from the original regularities. Both apophony and metatony became highly productive in Latvian and Lithuanian word formation, leading to complex morphonological relationships.</p> |
| topic |
dominance historical accentology accentuation monophtongization historical phonology Lithuanian Baltio-Slavic |
| url |
http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/2155 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT frederikkortlandt dominanceandmonophthongizationmethodversusinsight |
| _version_ |
1725726065024827392 |