A comparison of the conditional inference survival forest model to random survival forests based on a simulation study as well as on two applications with time-to-event data
Abstract Background Random survival forest (RSF) models have been identified as alternative methods to the Cox proportional hazards model in analysing time-to-event data. These methods, however, have been criticised for the bias that results from favouring covariates with many split-points and hence...
Main Authors: | Justine B. Nasejje, Henry Mwambi, Keertan Dheda, Maia Lesosky |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-017-0383-8 |
Similar Items
-
Application of random survival forests in understanding the determinants of under-five child mortality in Uganda in the presence of covariates that satisfy the proportional and non-proportional hazards assumption
by: Justine B. Nasejje, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Identification of Lifestyle Behaviors Associated with Recurrence and Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Random Survival Forests
by: Moniek van Zutphen, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Evaluating Random Forests for Survival Analysis Using Prediction Error Curves
by: Ulla B. Mogensen, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01) -
Identification of Factors Affecting Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients’ Survival Using the Random Survival Forest and Comparison with Cox Regression Model
by: M Safari, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance
by: Yingxin Liu, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)