Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools

Background and aims   the main part of students' time is spent at school. Recent studies have  released that lack of match between students' anthropometry size and dimensions of existing  furniture is a risk factor in creating discomfort and muscle- skeletal disorders (such as backache and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. Asaad, M. Hoseini, E. Habibi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2009-07-01
Series:Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ioh.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-45&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-a623482418514033abf5f1e81af9b050
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a623482418514033abf5f1e81af9b0502020-11-25T00:19:32ZfasIran University of Medical SciencesSalāmat-i kār-i Īrān1735-51332228-74932009-07-01625161Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schoolsZ. AsaadM. HoseiniE. HabibiBackground and aims   the main part of students' time is spent at school. Recent studies have  released that lack of match between students' anthropometry size and dimensions of existing  furniture is a risk factor in creating discomfort and muscle- skeletal disorders (such as backache and neck pain), reducing concentration, increasing fatigue, restless and eyestrain in youths and students.   Methods   In this study 982 students, 493 male (50.2%) and 489 female (49.8%) ranging 7 - 12 years old, were selected. In addition to age, sex, weight and height, six dimensions of anthropometric measures including: shoulder height, elbow rest height, knee height, popliteal height, buttock-popliteal length and hip breadth by anthropometry, caliper and adjustable seat height, goniometry, tape and scale, were taken into account.   Results   This study explains that there is a significant difference between the minimum and  maximum acceptable and available dimensions of furniture (p<0.001). The Height of desk in old  design is higher than acceptable height for many students (in the order of size in 100, 95.4, and 74.3 percent). The seat depth in this design is shorter for the majority of students (in the order of size in 92.1, 92 and 97.9 percent of studied students).   Conclusion   In designing suitable furniture for students, considering available anthropometry differences in age and sex is essential.   http://ioh.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-45&slc_lang=en&sid=1Ergonomics. AnthropometryfurnitureSchools
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. Asaad
M. Hoseini
E. Habibi
spellingShingle Z. Asaad
M. Hoseini
E. Habibi
Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools
Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
Ergonomics. Anthropometry
furniture
Schools
author_facet Z. Asaad
M. Hoseini
E. Habibi
author_sort Z. Asaad
title Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools
title_short Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools
title_full Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools
title_fullStr Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools
title_full_unstemmed Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in Isfahan schools
title_sort match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry in isfahan schools
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
issn 1735-5133
2228-7493
publishDate 2009-07-01
description Background and aims   the main part of students' time is spent at school. Recent studies have  released that lack of match between students' anthropometry size and dimensions of existing  furniture is a risk factor in creating discomfort and muscle- skeletal disorders (such as backache and neck pain), reducing concentration, increasing fatigue, restless and eyestrain in youths and students.   Methods   In this study 982 students, 493 male (50.2%) and 489 female (49.8%) ranging 7 - 12 years old, were selected. In addition to age, sex, weight and height, six dimensions of anthropometric measures including: shoulder height, elbow rest height, knee height, popliteal height, buttock-popliteal length and hip breadth by anthropometry, caliper and adjustable seat height, goniometry, tape and scale, were taken into account.   Results   This study explains that there is a significant difference between the minimum and  maximum acceptable and available dimensions of furniture (p<0.001). The Height of desk in old  design is higher than acceptable height for many students (in the order of size in 100, 95.4, and 74.3 percent). The seat depth in this design is shorter for the majority of students (in the order of size in 92.1, 92 and 97.9 percent of studied students).   Conclusion   In designing suitable furniture for students, considering available anthropometry differences in age and sex is essential.  
topic Ergonomics. Anthropometry
furniture
Schools
url http://ioh.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-45&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT zasaad matchbetweenschoolfurnituredimensionsandchildrensanthropometryinisfahanschools
AT mhoseini matchbetweenschoolfurnituredimensionsandchildrensanthropometryinisfahanschools
AT ehabibi matchbetweenschoolfurnituredimensionsandchildrensanthropometryinisfahanschools
_version_ 1725371471046377472