Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis

Background: Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) has frequently been reported as potential discriminator between depressed and healthy individuals, although contradicting results have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an up to date meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of FAA in m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikita van der Vinne, Madelon A. Vollebregt, Michel J.A.M. van Putten, Martijn Arns
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-01-01
Series:NeuroImage: Clinical
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158217301717
id doaj-a611078f67cd4cba8e696e5586e1319e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a611078f67cd4cba8e696e5586e1319e2020-11-24T21:21:46ZengElsevierNeuroImage: Clinical2213-15822017-01-01167987Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysisNikita van der Vinne0Madelon A. Vollebregt1Michel J.A.M. van Putten2Martijn Arns3Research Institute Brainclinics, Bijleveldsingel 34, 6524 AD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Synaeda Psycho Medisch Centrum, Fonteinland 9, 8913 CZ, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands; Dept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands; Corresponding author at: Research Institute Brainclinics, Bijleveldsingel 34, 6524 AD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Research Institute Brainclinics, Bijleveldsingel 34, 6524 AD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Dept. of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDept. of Clinical Neurophysiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands; Dept. of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The NetherlandsResearch Institute Brainclinics, Bijleveldsingel 34, 6524 AD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Dept. of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The NetherlandsBackground: Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) has frequently been reported as potential discriminator between depressed and healthy individuals, although contradicting results have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an up to date meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of FAA in major depressive disorder (MDD) and to further investigate discrepancies in a large cross-sectional dataset. Methods: SCOPUS database was searched through February 2017. Studies were included if the article reported on both MDD and controls, provided an FAA measure involving EEG electrodes F3/F4, and provided data regarding potential covariates. Hedges' d was calculated from FAA means and standard deviations (SDs). Potential covariates, such as age and gender, were explored. Post hoc analysis was performed to elucidate interindividual differences that could explain interstudy discrepancies. Results: 16 studies were included (MDD: n=1883, controls: n=2161). After resolving significant heterogeneity by excluding studies, a non-significant Grand Mean effect size (ES) was obtained (d=−0.007;CI=[−0.090]–[0.075]). Crosssectional analyses showed a significant three-way interaction for Gender×Age×Depression severity in the depressed group, which was prospectively replicated in an independent sample. Conclusions: The main result was a non-significant, negligible ES, demonstrating limited diagnostic value of FAA in MDD. The high degree of heterogeneity across studies indicates covariate influence, as was confirmed by crosssectional analyses, suggesting future studies should address this Gender×Age×Depression severity interaction. Upcoming studies should focus more on prognostic and research domain usages of FAA rather than a pure diagnostic tool. Keywords: Depression, MDD, Frontal alpha asymmetry, EEG, Electroencephalogram, Meta-analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158217301717
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikita van der Vinne
Madelon A. Vollebregt
Michel J.A.M. van Putten
Martijn Arns
spellingShingle Nikita van der Vinne
Madelon A. Vollebregt
Michel J.A.M. van Putten
Martijn Arns
Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
NeuroImage: Clinical
author_facet Nikita van der Vinne
Madelon A. Vollebregt
Michel J.A.M. van Putten
Martijn Arns
author_sort Nikita van der Vinne
title Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
title_short Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
title_full Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: Fact or fiction? A meta-analysis
title_sort frontal alpha asymmetry as a diagnostic marker in depression: fact or fiction? a meta-analysis
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage: Clinical
issn 2213-1582
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) has frequently been reported as potential discriminator between depressed and healthy individuals, although contradicting results have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an up to date meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of FAA in major depressive disorder (MDD) and to further investigate discrepancies in a large cross-sectional dataset. Methods: SCOPUS database was searched through February 2017. Studies were included if the article reported on both MDD and controls, provided an FAA measure involving EEG electrodes F3/F4, and provided data regarding potential covariates. Hedges' d was calculated from FAA means and standard deviations (SDs). Potential covariates, such as age and gender, were explored. Post hoc analysis was performed to elucidate interindividual differences that could explain interstudy discrepancies. Results: 16 studies were included (MDD: n=1883, controls: n=2161). After resolving significant heterogeneity by excluding studies, a non-significant Grand Mean effect size (ES) was obtained (d=−0.007;CI=[−0.090]–[0.075]). Crosssectional analyses showed a significant three-way interaction for Gender×Age×Depression severity in the depressed group, which was prospectively replicated in an independent sample. Conclusions: The main result was a non-significant, negligible ES, demonstrating limited diagnostic value of FAA in MDD. The high degree of heterogeneity across studies indicates covariate influence, as was confirmed by crosssectional analyses, suggesting future studies should address this Gender×Age×Depression severity interaction. Upcoming studies should focus more on prognostic and research domain usages of FAA rather than a pure diagnostic tool. Keywords: Depression, MDD, Frontal alpha asymmetry, EEG, Electroencephalogram, Meta-analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158217301717
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitavandervinne frontalalphaasymmetryasadiagnosticmarkerindepressionfactorfictionametaanalysis
AT madelonavollebregt frontalalphaasymmetryasadiagnosticmarkerindepressionfactorfictionametaanalysis
AT micheljamvanputten frontalalphaasymmetryasadiagnosticmarkerindepressionfactorfictionametaanalysis
AT martijnarns frontalalphaasymmetryasadiagnosticmarkerindepressionfactorfictionametaanalysis
_version_ 1725998402917892096