Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference

Eye movements are strongly influenced by the task given to an observer. The immediacy of such eye movements, which are difficult to control consciously, offers the potential to explore highly variable subjective evaluations, such as aesthetic preference, with reliable objective measures. We presente...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Holmes, Johannes M. Zanker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-08-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/i0448aap
id doaj-a607eb30dd8c4c1abf205b0d09b7915f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a607eb30dd8c4c1abf205b0d09b7915f2020-11-25T04:10:41ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-08-01310.1068/i0448aap10.1068_i0448aapUsing an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic PreferenceTim HolmesJohannes M. ZankerEye movements are strongly influenced by the task given to an observer. The immediacy of such eye movements, which are difficult to control consciously, offers the potential to explore highly variable subjective evaluations, such as aesthetic preference, with reliable objective measures. We presented a variety of images in sets of 2, 4, or 8 items for different durations and analyzed oculomotor statistics such as cumulative fixation duration, refixations, and the sequence of fixations while participants searched for their preferred image, after which participants indicated their preference using a button press. The total amount of time spent looking at any image correlates with selection preference and does so increasingly well with longer presentation duration. For short presentations, the first and last fixations correlate better with image preference. All response measures become increasingly variable as the number and complexity of presented images are increased. A weighted combination of these measures can significantly improve the correlation with preference, suggesting a “signature” which could be used as a reliable indicator for task-free subjective evaluation of stimuli in visual psychophysics. Its role as an improved fitness function in visually driven evolutionary algorithms is discussed.https://doi.org/10.1068/i0448aap
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tim Holmes
Johannes M. Zanker
spellingShingle Tim Holmes
Johannes M. Zanker
Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference
i-Perception
author_facet Tim Holmes
Johannes M. Zanker
author_sort Tim Holmes
title Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference
title_short Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference
title_full Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference
title_fullStr Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference
title_full_unstemmed Using an Oculomotor Signature as an Indicator of Aesthetic Preference
title_sort using an oculomotor signature as an indicator of aesthetic preference
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2012-08-01
description Eye movements are strongly influenced by the task given to an observer. The immediacy of such eye movements, which are difficult to control consciously, offers the potential to explore highly variable subjective evaluations, such as aesthetic preference, with reliable objective measures. We presented a variety of images in sets of 2, 4, or 8 items for different durations and analyzed oculomotor statistics such as cumulative fixation duration, refixations, and the sequence of fixations while participants searched for their preferred image, after which participants indicated their preference using a button press. The total amount of time spent looking at any image correlates with selection preference and does so increasingly well with longer presentation duration. For short presentations, the first and last fixations correlate better with image preference. All response measures become increasingly variable as the number and complexity of presented images are increased. A weighted combination of these measures can significantly improve the correlation with preference, suggesting a “signature” which could be used as a reliable indicator for task-free subjective evaluation of stimuli in visual psychophysics. Its role as an improved fitness function in visually driven evolutionary algorithms is discussed.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/i0448aap
work_keys_str_mv AT timholmes usinganoculomotorsignatureasanindicatorofaestheticpreference
AT johannesmzanker usinganoculomotorsignatureasanindicatorofaestheticpreference
_version_ 1724419615161843712