Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
Some results suggest that attentional selection in global/local processing occurs at two stages: an early stage, where global and local information of a hierarchical stimulus is filtered or weighted according to the current goal, and a late stage, where the contents of the stimulus are bound to thei...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061/full |
id |
doaj-a5fcbea858e546b6870432bf22483c1d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a5fcbea858e546b6870432bf22483c1d2020-11-25T01:11:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-02-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0006169037Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?Ronald eHübner0Universität KonstanzSome results suggest that attentional selection in global/local processing occurs at two stages: an early stage, where global and local information of a hierarchical stimulus is filtered or weighted according to the current goal, and a late stage, where the contents of the stimulus are bound to their respective level. Because it is assumed that binding improves attentional selectivity, accuracy should increase with response time. To see whether this prediction holds, a global/local experiment was conducted with hierarchical letters as stimuli, and where selection difficulty was varied by blocking versus randomizing the target levels. The results show that accuracy indeed increased with response time, although to a lesser extent under randomized levels. Because an increasing accuracy is also compatible with a gradually improving selectivity, corresponding sequential sampling models were fit to the distributional data. The results show that a discretely improving attentional selectivity accounts better for the data. Moreover, the parameters of the corresponding model indicate that randomizing the target level impaired the efficiency of early selection as well as that of content-to-level binding.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061/fullbindingglobal/local processingAttentional selectivitysequential samplingearly and late selection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ronald eHübner |
spellingShingle |
Ronald eHübner Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? Frontiers in Psychology binding global/local processing Attentional selectivity sequential sampling early and late selection |
author_facet |
Ronald eHübner |
author_sort |
Ronald eHübner |
title |
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? |
title_short |
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? |
title_full |
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? |
title_fullStr |
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? |
title_sort |
does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually? |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2014-02-01 |
description |
Some results suggest that attentional selection in global/local processing occurs at two stages: an early stage, where global and local information of a hierarchical stimulus is filtered or weighted according to the current goal, and a late stage, where the contents of the stimulus are bound to their respective level. Because it is assumed that binding improves attentional selectivity, accuracy should increase with response time. To see whether this prediction holds, a global/local experiment was conducted with hierarchical letters as stimuli, and where selection difficulty was varied by blocking versus randomizing the target levels. The results show that accuracy indeed increased with response time, although to a lesser extent under randomized levels. Because an increasing accuracy is also compatible with a gradually improving selectivity, corresponding sequential sampling models were fit to the distributional data. The results show that a discretely improving attentional selectivity accounts better for the data. Moreover, the parameters of the corresponding model indicate that randomizing the target level impaired the efficiency of early selection as well as that of content-to-level binding. |
topic |
binding global/local processing Attentional selectivity sequential sampling early and late selection |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ronaldehubner doesattentionalselectivityingloballocalprocessingimprovediscretelyorgradually |
_version_ |
1725169596482191360 |