Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?

Some results suggest that attentional selection in global/local processing occurs at two stages: an early stage, where global and local information of a hierarchical stimulus is filtered or weighted according to the current goal, and a late stage, where the contents of the stimulus are bound to thei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ronald eHübner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061/full
id doaj-a5fcbea858e546b6870432bf22483c1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5fcbea858e546b6870432bf22483c1d2020-11-25T01:11:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-02-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0006169037Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?Ronald eHübner0Universität KonstanzSome results suggest that attentional selection in global/local processing occurs at two stages: an early stage, where global and local information of a hierarchical stimulus is filtered or weighted according to the current goal, and a late stage, where the contents of the stimulus are bound to their respective level. Because it is assumed that binding improves attentional selectivity, accuracy should increase with response time. To see whether this prediction holds, a global/local experiment was conducted with hierarchical letters as stimuli, and where selection difficulty was varied by blocking versus randomizing the target levels. The results show that accuracy indeed increased with response time, although to a lesser extent under randomized levels. Because an increasing accuracy is also compatible with a gradually improving selectivity, corresponding sequential sampling models were fit to the distributional data. The results show that a discretely improving attentional selectivity accounts better for the data. Moreover, the parameters of the corresponding model indicate that randomizing the target level impaired the efficiency of early selection as well as that of content-to-level binding.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061/fullbindingglobal/local processingAttentional selectivitysequential samplingearly and late selection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ronald eHübner
spellingShingle Ronald eHübner
Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
Frontiers in Psychology
binding
global/local processing
Attentional selectivity
sequential sampling
early and late selection
author_facet Ronald eHübner
author_sort Ronald eHübner
title Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
title_short Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
title_full Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
title_fullStr Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
title_full_unstemmed Does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
title_sort does attentional selectivity in global/local processing improve discretely or gradually?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-02-01
description Some results suggest that attentional selection in global/local processing occurs at two stages: an early stage, where global and local information of a hierarchical stimulus is filtered or weighted according to the current goal, and a late stage, where the contents of the stimulus are bound to their respective level. Because it is assumed that binding improves attentional selectivity, accuracy should increase with response time. To see whether this prediction holds, a global/local experiment was conducted with hierarchical letters as stimuli, and where selection difficulty was varied by blocking versus randomizing the target levels. The results show that accuracy indeed increased with response time, although to a lesser extent under randomized levels. Because an increasing accuracy is also compatible with a gradually improving selectivity, corresponding sequential sampling models were fit to the distributional data. The results show that a discretely improving attentional selectivity accounts better for the data. Moreover, the parameters of the corresponding model indicate that randomizing the target level impaired the efficiency of early selection as well as that of content-to-level binding.
topic binding
global/local processing
Attentional selectivity
sequential sampling
early and late selection
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00061/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ronaldehubner doesattentionalselectivityingloballocalprocessingimprovediscretelyorgradually
_version_ 1725169596482191360