Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report

Condition: This case report demonstrates the use of alloplastic reconstruction in young children.Method: A three-dimensionally printed titanium implant was used to reconstruct a subtotal maxillectomy defect in a 4-year-old child.Results: We report an 8-year follow-up. The endoprosthesis was split at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maurice Yves Mommaerts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00028/full
id doaj-a5fc709282064d06b4ca185cdc6f2912
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5fc709282064d06b4ca185cdc6f29122020-11-25T03:30:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2020-06-01710.3389/fsurg.2020.00028535475Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up ReportMaurice Yves MommaertsCondition: This case report demonstrates the use of alloplastic reconstruction in young children.Method: A three-dimensionally printed titanium implant was used to reconstruct a subtotal maxillectomy defect in a 4-year-old child.Results: We report an 8-year follow-up. The endoprosthesis was split at the midline to address transverse growth. The main finding is that the stigma surrounding resection and surgical reconstruction in pre-adolescents can be prevented by the use of alloplastic reconstruction based on titanium osseointegration. An additional finding is that shear forces should be prevented at the insertion points of the fixation screws in the facial walls by providing a vertical support for the maxillary/palatal shelves. Lastly, transverse maxillary growth in the circumferential sutures and functional matrix was not hampered by splitting the endo- and exoprostheses in the middle (where the mid-palatal suture would normally be located).Conclusion: Alloplastic reconstruction of maxillectomy defects in childhood can offer a viable temporary solution.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00028/fulltitaniumfollow-up studiescraniotomyfacial bonesparanasal sinuses
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maurice Yves Mommaerts
spellingShingle Maurice Yves Mommaerts
Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report
Frontiers in Surgery
titanium
follow-up studies
craniotomy
facial bones
paranasal sinuses
author_facet Maurice Yves Mommaerts
author_sort Maurice Yves Mommaerts
title Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report
title_short Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report
title_full Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report
title_fullStr Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of a Subtotal Maxillectomy Defect Using a Customized Titanium Implant in a 4-Year-Old Child: An 8-Year Follow-Up Report
title_sort reconstruction of a subtotal maxillectomy defect using a customized titanium implant in a 4-year-old child: an 8-year follow-up report
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Surgery
issn 2296-875X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Condition: This case report demonstrates the use of alloplastic reconstruction in young children.Method: A three-dimensionally printed titanium implant was used to reconstruct a subtotal maxillectomy defect in a 4-year-old child.Results: We report an 8-year follow-up. The endoprosthesis was split at the midline to address transverse growth. The main finding is that the stigma surrounding resection and surgical reconstruction in pre-adolescents can be prevented by the use of alloplastic reconstruction based on titanium osseointegration. An additional finding is that shear forces should be prevented at the insertion points of the fixation screws in the facial walls by providing a vertical support for the maxillary/palatal shelves. Lastly, transverse maxillary growth in the circumferential sutures and functional matrix was not hampered by splitting the endo- and exoprostheses in the middle (where the mid-palatal suture would normally be located).Conclusion: Alloplastic reconstruction of maxillectomy defects in childhood can offer a viable temporary solution.
topic titanium
follow-up studies
craniotomy
facial bones
paranasal sinuses
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00028/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mauriceyvesmommaerts reconstructionofasubtotalmaxillectomydefectusingacustomizedtitaniumimplantina4yearoldchildan8yearfollowupreport
_version_ 1724576589292765184