Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal
This work is a theoretical discussion about concept formation in a cultural-historical perspective that articulates Vygotsky’s system of concepts within Leontiev’s structure of activity. This effort has led to a theoretical proposition that we call concept-activity, a dialectical unity formed by a c...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Культурно-историческая психология |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2021/n2/Lago_Mattos.shtml |
id |
doaj-a5d9b450658147e7bd6cc744f11931fc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a5d9b450658147e7bd6cc744f11931fc2021-08-11T11:35:51ZengMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationКультурно-историческая психология1816-54352224-89352021-08-01172293610.17759/chp.2021170203Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis ProposalLago L0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3143-1757Mattos C.R.1 Sao Paolo, BrazilUniversity of Sa~o Paulo, Sao Paolo, BrazilThis work is a theoretical discussion about concept formation in a cultural-historical perspective that articulates Vygotsky’s system of concepts within Leontiev’s structure of activity. This effort has led to a theoretical proposition that we call concept-activity, a dialectical unity formed by a concept and its genetic activities, i.e., the systematised activities in which concepts emerge directed to a purpose. Taking volition and conscious awareness as analytic categories, we initially relate scientific concepts with actions — concepts-action — and everyday concepts with operations — concepts-operation. The articulation of these elements drives the emergence of conceptual thinking as an activity, framed by the term concept-activity. In other words, while scientific concepts are related to actions because both arise from a conscious and voluntary dimension, everyday concepts are related to operations through a non-conscious and non-voluntary dimension. A discussion on how the concept-activity synthetises the movement between these two forms of conceptualisations and its implication to concept formation is provided.https://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2021/n2/Lago_Mattos.shtmlconcept formationactivity theoryvolition |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lago L Mattos C.R. |
spellingShingle |
Lago L Mattos C.R. Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal Культурно-историческая психология concept formation activity theory volition |
author_facet |
Lago L Mattos C.R. |
author_sort |
Lago L |
title |
Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal |
title_short |
Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal |
title_full |
Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal |
title_fullStr |
Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bridging Concept and Activity: a Dialectical Synthesis Proposal |
title_sort |
bridging concept and activity: a dialectical synthesis proposal |
publisher |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education |
series |
Культурно-историческая психология |
issn |
1816-5435 2224-8935 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
This work is a theoretical discussion about concept formation in a cultural-historical perspective that articulates Vygotsky’s system of concepts within Leontiev’s structure of activity. This effort has led to a theoretical proposition that we call concept-activity, a dialectical unity formed by a concept and its genetic activities, i.e., the systematised activities in which concepts emerge directed to a purpose. Taking volition and conscious awareness as analytic categories, we initially relate scientific concepts with actions — concepts-action — and everyday concepts with operations — concepts-operation. The articulation of these elements drives the emergence of conceptual thinking as an activity, framed by the term concept-activity. In other words, while scientific concepts are related to actions because both arise from a conscious and voluntary dimension, everyday concepts are related to operations through a non-conscious and non-voluntary dimension. A discussion on how the concept-activity synthetises the movement between these two forms of conceptualisations and its implication to concept formation is provided. |
topic |
concept formation activity theory volition |
url |
https://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2021/n2/Lago_Mattos.shtml |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lagol bridgingconceptandactivityadialecticalsynthesisproposal AT mattoscr bridgingconceptandactivityadialecticalsynthesisproposal |
_version_ |
1721211434705092608 |