Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective

The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) obliges EU Member States to achieve good ecological status in all surface waters by 2027 at the latest. In many regions, this implies fundamental transformation from engineered water landscapes back to near-natural structures. By example of the German State of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moritz Reese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3368
id doaj-a5d45fd3eb20407e9fdf4d4e77c1fd3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5d45fd3eb20407e9fdf4d4e77c1fd3b2021-03-19T00:04:23ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-03-01133368336810.3390/su13063368Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German PerspectiveMoritz Reese0Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318 Leipzig, GermanyThe EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) obliges EU Member States to achieve good ecological status in all surface waters by 2027 at the latest. In many regions, this implies fundamental transformation from engineered water landscapes back to near-natural structures. By example of the German State of Lower Saxony it is shown how this transformation of water landscapes essentially requires a transformation of the institutional foundations of water management, too. It is argued from a legal perspective that certain general, justiciable minimum requirements are to be deduced from the WFD as to (1) planning and enforcement of restoration measures, (2) land acquisition, (3) organisation and (4) finance which delimit the ample margins Member States enjoy in designing the institutional substructure. With regard to Lower Saxony, it is explained why this State is clearly failing to meet the minimum requirements and how it needs to transform its institutional arrangements to make them fit for purpose. The article concludes that WFD enforcement should pay more attention to the institutional underpinning and it submits that examples and benchmarks should be further explored by comparative research.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3368EU water framework directiveGermanyLower Saxonyecologic water qualityriver restorationplanning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moritz Reese
spellingShingle Moritz Reese
Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective
Sustainability
EU water framework directive
Germany
Lower Saxony
ecologic water quality
river restoration
planning
author_facet Moritz Reese
author_sort Moritz Reese
title Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective
title_short Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective
title_full Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective
title_fullStr Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Transformation to Healthy Water Ecology—Institutional Requirements, Deficits and Options in European and German Perspective
title_sort transformation to healthy water ecology—institutional requirements, deficits and options in european and german perspective
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) obliges EU Member States to achieve good ecological status in all surface waters by 2027 at the latest. In many regions, this implies fundamental transformation from engineered water landscapes back to near-natural structures. By example of the German State of Lower Saxony it is shown how this transformation of water landscapes essentially requires a transformation of the institutional foundations of water management, too. It is argued from a legal perspective that certain general, justiciable minimum requirements are to be deduced from the WFD as to (1) planning and enforcement of restoration measures, (2) land acquisition, (3) organisation and (4) finance which delimit the ample margins Member States enjoy in designing the institutional substructure. With regard to Lower Saxony, it is explained why this State is clearly failing to meet the minimum requirements and how it needs to transform its institutional arrangements to make them fit for purpose. The article concludes that WFD enforcement should pay more attention to the institutional underpinning and it submits that examples and benchmarks should be further explored by comparative research.
topic EU water framework directive
Germany
Lower Saxony
ecologic water quality
river restoration
planning
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3368
work_keys_str_mv AT moritzreese transformationtohealthywaterecologyinstitutionalrequirementsdeficitsandoptionsineuropeanandgermanperspective
_version_ 1724214848377585664