An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.

We determined the effects of wearing an above-knee compression garment (CG) on knee joint position sense. Healthy young adults (n = 24, age = 27.46 ± 4.65 years) performed a passive knee position-matching task on an isokinetic dynamometer with each leg separately. We determined the magnitude of comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: János Négyesi, Ali Mobark, Li Yin Zhang, Tibor Hortobagyi, Ryoichi Nagatomi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6122810?pdf=render
id doaj-a5a756c8d7f14ecc85f65ba2263d5ea8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5a756c8d7f14ecc85f65ba2263d5ea82020-11-25T01:56:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01139e020328810.1371/journal.pone.0203288An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.János NégyesiAli MobarkLi Yin ZhangTibor HortobagyiRyoichi NagatomiWe determined the effects of wearing an above-knee compression garment (CG) on knee joint position sense. Healthy young adults (n = 24, age = 27.46 ± 4.65 years) performed a passive knee position-matching task on an isokinetic dynamometer with each leg separately. We determined the magnitude of compression by measuring anatomical thigh cross sectional area (CSA) in standing using magnetic resonance imaging. Wearing the CG compressed CSA by 2% (t = 2.91, p = 0.010, Cohen's d = 0.68). Repeated measures ANOVA (rANOVA) with three repetition factors (condition: CG, no CG; leg: right dominant, left non-dominant; and target angles: 30°, 45°, 60°) revealed an effect of angles (p < 0.001), where the matching of knee joint position was more accurate at 60° compared to 30° and 45° (p < 0.001). However, CG did not reduce passive joint position sense errors. In fact, joint position error was less without CG (p = 0.014). In conclusion, while CG does compress the thigh it does not afford the purported benefits for proprioception as measured by a target-matching task in the present study.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6122810?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author János Négyesi
Ali Mobark
Li Yin Zhang
Tibor Hortobagyi
Ryoichi Nagatomi
spellingShingle János Négyesi
Ali Mobark
Li Yin Zhang
Tibor Hortobagyi
Ryoichi Nagatomi
An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
PLoS ONE
author_facet János Négyesi
Ali Mobark
Li Yin Zhang
Tibor Hortobagyi
Ryoichi Nagatomi
author_sort János Négyesi
title An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
title_short An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
title_full An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
title_fullStr An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
title_full_unstemmed An above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
title_sort above-knee compression garment does not improve passive knee joint position sense in healthy adults.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description We determined the effects of wearing an above-knee compression garment (CG) on knee joint position sense. Healthy young adults (n = 24, age = 27.46 ± 4.65 years) performed a passive knee position-matching task on an isokinetic dynamometer with each leg separately. We determined the magnitude of compression by measuring anatomical thigh cross sectional area (CSA) in standing using magnetic resonance imaging. Wearing the CG compressed CSA by 2% (t = 2.91, p = 0.010, Cohen's d = 0.68). Repeated measures ANOVA (rANOVA) with three repetition factors (condition: CG, no CG; leg: right dominant, left non-dominant; and target angles: 30°, 45°, 60°) revealed an effect of angles (p < 0.001), where the matching of knee joint position was more accurate at 60° compared to 30° and 45° (p < 0.001). However, CG did not reduce passive joint position sense errors. In fact, joint position error was less without CG (p = 0.014). In conclusion, while CG does compress the thigh it does not afford the purported benefits for proprioception as measured by a target-matching task in the present study.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6122810?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT janosnegyesi anabovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT alimobark anabovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT liyinzhang anabovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT tiborhortobagyi anabovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT ryoichinagatomi anabovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT janosnegyesi abovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT alimobark abovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT liyinzhang abovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT tiborhortobagyi abovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
AT ryoichinagatomi abovekneecompressiongarmentdoesnotimprovepassivekneejointpositionsenseinhealthyadults
_version_ 1724977383457423360