Journal of Controversies in Biomedical Research - the Need of the Hour
Approximately 75-89% of the peer–reviewed published literature are thought to be non-reproducible. A need exists to better address the problem of irreproducibility of research data so that contradictory, null and negative findings can be disclosed in an unbiased, non-judgemental, yet scientifically...
Main Authors: | Christudas Morais, Luis Vitetta |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Biogenic Press
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Controversies in Biomedical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcbmr.com/index.php/jcbmr/article/view/5 |
Similar Items
-
Irreproducibility –The deadly sin of preclinical research in drug development
by: Sadasivan Kalathil Pillai, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
An Assessment of Retractions as a Measure of Scientific Misconduct and Impact on Public Health Risks
by: Abritis, Alison J.
Published: (2015) -
Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture
by: Natalie Matosin, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Alpha-class Glutathione Transferases from Pig: a Comparative Study
by: Fedulova, Natalia
Published: (2011) -
Improving accessibility and distinction between negative results in biomedical relation extraction
by: Diana Sousa, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)