Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
Journal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but ther...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Australasian Association for Information Systems
2016-10-01
|
Series: | Australasian Journal of Information Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1262 |
id |
doaj-a59c9279f00c4f42b53e997c27e84dc2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a59c9279f00c4f42b53e997c27e84dc22021-08-02T02:11:20ZengAustralasian Association for Information SystemsAustralasian Journal of Information Systems1449-86181449-86182016-10-0120010.3127/ajis.v20i0.1262599Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher ViewsDarryl Coulthard0Susan Keller1La Trobe UniversityLa Trobe UniversityJournal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but there have been few empirical studies on the possible effects. To address this gap, we surveyed Information Systems (IS) academics who published in one of three key IS conferences in 2013, to gather their views of the effects of journal ranking systems. Overall, we found that the concerns in the literature were strongly reflected in the views of those surveyed. Academics believe the system has greatly increased their publication anxiety. While most believed that the quality of published research had improved, researchers believe the ranking systems inhibit innovative, risky research, and encourages safe, conforming, mainstream research.http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1262journal rankingsqualitypublication anxietysurvey |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Darryl Coulthard Susan Keller |
spellingShingle |
Darryl Coulthard Susan Keller Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views Australasian Journal of Information Systems journal rankings quality publication anxiety survey |
author_facet |
Darryl Coulthard Susan Keller |
author_sort |
Darryl Coulthard |
title |
Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views |
title_short |
Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views |
title_full |
Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views |
title_fullStr |
Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views |
title_full_unstemmed |
Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views |
title_sort |
publication anxiety, quality, and journal rankings: researcher views |
publisher |
Australasian Association for Information Systems |
series |
Australasian Journal of Information Systems |
issn |
1449-8618 1449-8618 |
publishDate |
2016-10-01 |
description |
Journal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but there have been few empirical studies on the possible effects. To address this gap, we surveyed Information Systems (IS) academics who published in one of three key IS conferences in 2013, to gather their views of the effects of journal ranking systems. Overall, we found that the concerns in the literature were strongly reflected in the views of those surveyed. Academics believe the system has greatly increased their publication anxiety. While most believed that the quality of published research had improved, researchers believe the ranking systems inhibit innovative, risky research, and encourages safe, conforming, mainstream research. |
topic |
journal rankings quality publication anxiety survey |
url |
http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1262 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT darrylcoulthard publicationanxietyqualityandjournalrankingsresearcherviews AT susankeller publicationanxietyqualityandjournalrankingsresearcherviews |
_version_ |
1721244174142930944 |