Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views

Journal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darryl Coulthard, Susan Keller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Australasian Association for Information Systems 2016-10-01
Series:Australasian Journal of Information Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1262
id doaj-a59c9279f00c4f42b53e997c27e84dc2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a59c9279f00c4f42b53e997c27e84dc22021-08-02T02:11:20ZengAustralasian Association for Information SystemsAustralasian Journal of Information Systems1449-86181449-86182016-10-0120010.3127/ajis.v20i0.1262599Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher ViewsDarryl Coulthard0Susan Keller1La Trobe UniversityLa Trobe UniversityJournal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but there have been few empirical studies on the possible effects. To address this gap, we surveyed Information Systems (IS) academics who published in one of three key IS conferences in 2013, to gather their views of the effects of journal ranking systems. Overall, we found that the concerns in the literature were strongly reflected in the views of those surveyed. Academics believe the system has greatly increased their publication anxiety. While most believed that the quality of published research had improved, researchers believe the ranking systems inhibit innovative, risky research, and encourages safe, conforming, mainstream research.http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1262journal rankingsqualitypublication anxietysurvey
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Darryl Coulthard
Susan Keller
spellingShingle Darryl Coulthard
Susan Keller
Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
Australasian Journal of Information Systems
journal rankings
quality
publication anxiety
survey
author_facet Darryl Coulthard
Susan Keller
author_sort Darryl Coulthard
title Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
title_short Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
title_full Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
title_fullStr Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
title_full_unstemmed Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views
title_sort publication anxiety, quality, and journal rankings: researcher views
publisher Australasian Association for Information Systems
series Australasian Journal of Information Systems
issn 1449-8618
1449-8618
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Journal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but there have been few empirical studies on the possible effects. To address this gap, we surveyed Information Systems (IS) academics who published in one of three key IS conferences in 2013, to gather their views of the effects of journal ranking systems. Overall, we found that the concerns in the literature were strongly reflected in the views of those surveyed. Academics believe the system has greatly increased their publication anxiety. While most believed that the quality of published research had improved, researchers believe the ranking systems inhibit innovative, risky research, and encourages safe, conforming, mainstream research.
topic journal rankings
quality
publication anxiety
survey
url http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1262
work_keys_str_mv AT darrylcoulthard publicationanxietyqualityandjournalrankingsresearcherviews
AT susankeller publicationanxietyqualityandjournalrankingsresearcherviews
_version_ 1721244174142930944