Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs

<i>Background</i>: There are currently no effective and accurate blood loss volume (BLV) estimation methods that can be implemented in operating rooms. To improve the accuracy and reliability of BLV estimation and facilitate clinical implementation, we propose a novel estimation method u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang Chen, Chengcheng Hong, Michael R. Pinsky, Ting Ma, Gilles Clermont
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6558
id doaj-a589438b0c1b43d296945fdec940ec8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a589438b0c1b43d296945fdec940ec8f2020-11-25T04:08:22ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-11-01206558655810.3390/s20226558Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital SignsYang Chen0Chengcheng Hong1Michael R. Pinsky2Ting Ma3Gilles Clermont4Department of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, ChinaDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USADepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, ChinaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA<i>Background</i>: There are currently no effective and accurate blood loss volume (BLV) estimation methods that can be implemented in operating rooms. To improve the accuracy and reliability of BLV estimation and facilitate clinical implementation, we propose a novel estimation method using continuously monitored photoplethysmography (PPG) and invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP). <i>Methods:</i> Forty anesthetized York Pigs (31.82 ± 3.52 kg) underwent a controlled hemorrhage at 20 mL/min until shock development was included. Machine-learning-based BLV estimation models were proposed and tested on normalized features derived by vital signs. <i>Results:</i> The results showed that the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for estimating BLV against the reference BLV of our proposed random-forest-derived BLV estimation models using PPG and ABP features, as well as the combination of ABP and PPG features, were 11.9 ± 156.2, 6.5 ± 161.5, and 7.0 ± 139.4 mL, respectively. Compared with traditional hematocrit computation formulas (estimation error: 102.1 ± 313.5 mL), our proposed models outperformed by nearly 200 mL in SD. <i>Conclusion:</i> This is the first attempt at predicting quantitative BLV from noninvasive measurements. Normalized PPG features are superior to ABP in accurately estimating early-stage BLV, and normalized invasive ABP features could enhance model performance in the event of a massive BLV.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6558photoplethysmographyarterial blood pressureblood loss estimationsurgical hemorrhagemachine learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yang Chen
Chengcheng Hong
Michael R. Pinsky
Ting Ma
Gilles Clermont
spellingShingle Yang Chen
Chengcheng Hong
Michael R. Pinsky
Ting Ma
Gilles Clermont
Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs
Sensors
photoplethysmography
arterial blood pressure
blood loss estimation
surgical hemorrhage
machine learning
author_facet Yang Chen
Chengcheng Hong
Michael R. Pinsky
Ting Ma
Gilles Clermont
author_sort Yang Chen
title Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs
title_short Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs
title_full Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs
title_fullStr Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs
title_sort estimating surgical blood loss volume using continuously monitored vital signs
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2020-11-01
description <i>Background</i>: There are currently no effective and accurate blood loss volume (BLV) estimation methods that can be implemented in operating rooms. To improve the accuracy and reliability of BLV estimation and facilitate clinical implementation, we propose a novel estimation method using continuously monitored photoplethysmography (PPG) and invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP). <i>Methods:</i> Forty anesthetized York Pigs (31.82 ± 3.52 kg) underwent a controlled hemorrhage at 20 mL/min until shock development was included. Machine-learning-based BLV estimation models were proposed and tested on normalized features derived by vital signs. <i>Results:</i> The results showed that the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for estimating BLV against the reference BLV of our proposed random-forest-derived BLV estimation models using PPG and ABP features, as well as the combination of ABP and PPG features, were 11.9 ± 156.2, 6.5 ± 161.5, and 7.0 ± 139.4 mL, respectively. Compared with traditional hematocrit computation formulas (estimation error: 102.1 ± 313.5 mL), our proposed models outperformed by nearly 200 mL in SD. <i>Conclusion:</i> This is the first attempt at predicting quantitative BLV from noninvasive measurements. Normalized PPG features are superior to ABP in accurately estimating early-stage BLV, and normalized invasive ABP features could enhance model performance in the event of a massive BLV.
topic photoplethysmography
arterial blood pressure
blood loss estimation
surgical hemorrhage
machine learning
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/22/6558
work_keys_str_mv AT yangchen estimatingsurgicalbloodlossvolumeusingcontinuouslymonitoredvitalsigns
AT chengchenghong estimatingsurgicalbloodlossvolumeusingcontinuouslymonitoredvitalsigns
AT michaelrpinsky estimatingsurgicalbloodlossvolumeusingcontinuouslymonitoredvitalsigns
AT tingma estimatingsurgicalbloodlossvolumeusingcontinuouslymonitoredvitalsigns
AT gillesclermont estimatingsurgicalbloodlossvolumeusingcontinuouslymonitoredvitalsigns
_version_ 1724426188496044032