A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been shown to be associated differentially with contraceptive use based on type, with IPV more likely among pill users and less likely among condom users. Recent increases in IUD uptake allow consideration of this type of contraceptive. We assessed the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-04-01
|
Series: | EClinicalMedicine |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537020300626 |
id |
doaj-a583114fd54348df810a345c835bc212 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a583114fd54348df810a345c835bc2122020-11-25T02:12:53ZengElsevierEClinicalMedicine2589-53702020-04-0121A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural IndiaGrace L. Chen0Jay G. Silverman1Anvita Dixit2Shahina Begum3Mohan Ghule4Madhusudana Battala5Nicole E. Johns6Anita Raj7Sarah Averbach8University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0606, La Jolla, CA 92093, United StatesCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United StatesCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States; Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health, San Diego State University, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United StatesDepartment of Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, J.M Street, Parel, Mumbai 400012, IndiaCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United StatesPopulation Council, Zone 5A, Ground Floor, India Habitat Center, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110003, IndiaCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United StatesCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United StatesCenter on Gender Equity and Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive #0507, La Jolla, CA, 92093, United States; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Drive #7433, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, 9300 Campus Point Drive #7433, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been shown to be associated differentially with contraceptive use based on type, with IPV more likely among pill users and less likely among condom users. Recent increases in IUD uptake allow consideration of this type of contraceptive. We assessed the association between self-reported IPV and self-reported contraceptive use, by type, among non-pregnant married women in rural India in a region with higher than average IUD use. Methods: We assessed the association between past 12-month IPV (physical, sexual, or any) and past 3-month contraceptive use (condom, pill, IUD, or any modern method) using crude and adjusted multinomial logistic regression models. Findings: Among the 1001 women included, 109 (10·9%) reported experiencing physical IPV and 27 (2·7%) reported experiencing sexual IPV in the past 12 months. Women experiencing physical IPV were significantly less likely to use condoms (adjusted relative risk ratio [RRR]: 0·54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·30–0·98, p = 0·042) than women not experiencing violence. There was a trend towards increased IUD use among women experiencing physical IPV (adjusted RRR: 1·78, 95% CI: 0·91–3·41, p = 0·091) compared to those not experiencing physical IPV, but this did not reach statistical significance. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that women who experience physical IPV in India are less likely to use condoms and may be more likely to use IUDs than women without exposure to IPV. This research expands on prior findings suggesting higher uptake of women-controlled contraceptives among women contending with IPV in India. Keywords: Intimate partner violence (IPV), Contraception, Family planning, Reproductive health, Indiahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537020300626 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Grace L. Chen Jay G. Silverman Anvita Dixit Shahina Begum Mohan Ghule Madhusudana Battala Nicole E. Johns Anita Raj Sarah Averbach |
spellingShingle |
Grace L. Chen Jay G. Silverman Anvita Dixit Shahina Begum Mohan Ghule Madhusudana Battala Nicole E. Johns Anita Raj Sarah Averbach A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India EClinicalMedicine |
author_facet |
Grace L. Chen Jay G. Silverman Anvita Dixit Shahina Begum Mohan Ghule Madhusudana Battala Nicole E. Johns Anita Raj Sarah Averbach |
author_sort |
Grace L. Chen |
title |
A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India |
title_short |
A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India |
title_full |
A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India |
title_fullStr |
A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India |
title_full_unstemmed |
A cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural India |
title_sort |
cross-sectional analysis of intimate partner violence and family planning use in rural india |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
EClinicalMedicine |
issn |
2589-5370 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been shown to be associated differentially with contraceptive use based on type, with IPV more likely among pill users and less likely among condom users. Recent increases in IUD uptake allow consideration of this type of contraceptive. We assessed the association between self-reported IPV and self-reported contraceptive use, by type, among non-pregnant married women in rural India in a region with higher than average IUD use. Methods: We assessed the association between past 12-month IPV (physical, sexual, or any) and past 3-month contraceptive use (condom, pill, IUD, or any modern method) using crude and adjusted multinomial logistic regression models. Findings: Among the 1001 women included, 109 (10·9%) reported experiencing physical IPV and 27 (2·7%) reported experiencing sexual IPV in the past 12 months. Women experiencing physical IPV were significantly less likely to use condoms (adjusted relative risk ratio [RRR]: 0·54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·30–0·98, p = 0·042) than women not experiencing violence. There was a trend towards increased IUD use among women experiencing physical IPV (adjusted RRR: 1·78, 95% CI: 0·91–3·41, p = 0·091) compared to those not experiencing physical IPV, but this did not reach statistical significance. Interpretation: Our findings suggest that women who experience physical IPV in India are less likely to use condoms and may be more likely to use IUDs than women without exposure to IPV. This research expands on prior findings suggesting higher uptake of women-controlled contraceptives among women contending with IPV in India. Keywords: Intimate partner violence (IPV), Contraception, Family planning, Reproductive health, India |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537020300626 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gracelchen acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT jaygsilverman acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT anvitadixit acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT shahinabegum acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT mohanghule acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT madhusudanabattala acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT nicoleejohns acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT anitaraj acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT sarahaverbach acrosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT gracelchen crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT jaygsilverman crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT anvitadixit crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT shahinabegum crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT mohanghule crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT madhusudanabattala crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT nicoleejohns crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT anitaraj crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia AT sarahaverbach crosssectionalanalysisofintimatepartnerviolenceandfamilyplanninguseinruralindia |
_version_ |
1724907632030908416 |