A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
When decision-makers’ judgments are uncertain, they often express their opinions using grey linguistic variables. Once used, the data often retains its grey nature throughout all subsequent decision-making iterations. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a tool used when making complicated decisi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555933 |
id |
doaj-a5758025297844bcbbc47b128becd431 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a5758025297844bcbbc47b128becd4312021-05-10T00:27:19ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1563-51472021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5555933A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWMReda M. S. Abdulaal0Omer A. Bafail1Departmentof Industrial EngineeringDepartmentof Industrial EngineeringWhen decision-makers’ judgments are uncertain, they often express their opinions using grey linguistic variables. Once used, the data often retains its grey nature throughout all subsequent decision-making iterations. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a tool used when making complicated decisions and in circumstances where several criteria require evaluation to choose the most desirable option. Grey data serves as the basis for several MCDM methods. This paper compares two MCDM methods, Grey-Linear-Programming (GLP) and Grey-Best-Worst-Method (GBWM), in terms of the weights of decision criteria and their rankings. Moreover, Grey-The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (GTOPSIS) was used to rank the weights of the two methods. Study findings demonstrated that GBWM requires more mathematical calculations than GLP, based on linear programming's classic simplex method. On the other hand, when GTOPSIS follows GLP, the alternative rank does not change compared to when GTOPSIS followed GBWM. For the applications used in this comparison, GLP procedure is considered simpler than GBWM procedure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555933 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Reda M. S. Abdulaal Omer A. Bafail |
spellingShingle |
Reda M. S. Abdulaal Omer A. Bafail A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
author_facet |
Reda M. S. Abdulaal Omer A. Bafail |
author_sort |
Reda M. S. Abdulaal |
title |
A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM |
title_short |
A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM |
title_full |
A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM |
title_fullStr |
A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM |
title_sort |
comparative study between glp and gbwm |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Mathematical Problems in Engineering |
issn |
1563-5147 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
When decision-makers’ judgments are uncertain, they often express their opinions using grey linguistic variables. Once used, the data often retains its grey nature throughout all subsequent decision-making iterations. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a tool used when making complicated decisions and in circumstances where several criteria require evaluation to choose the most desirable option. Grey data serves as the basis for several MCDM methods. This paper compares two MCDM methods, Grey-Linear-Programming (GLP) and Grey-Best-Worst-Method (GBWM), in terms of the weights of decision criteria and their rankings. Moreover, Grey-The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (GTOPSIS) was used to rank the weights of the two methods. Study findings demonstrated that GBWM requires more mathematical calculations than GLP, based on linear programming's classic simplex method. On the other hand, when GTOPSIS follows GLP, the alternative rank does not change compared to when GTOPSIS followed GBWM. For the applications used in this comparison, GLP procedure is considered simpler than GBWM procedure. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555933 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT redamsabdulaal acomparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm AT omerabafail acomparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm AT redamsabdulaal comparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm AT omerabafail comparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm |
_version_ |
1721453741525172224 |