A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM

When decision-makers’ judgments are uncertain, they often express their opinions using grey linguistic variables. Once used, the data often retains its grey nature throughout all subsequent decision-making iterations. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a tool used when making complicated decisi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reda M. S. Abdulaal, Omer A. Bafail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555933
id doaj-a5758025297844bcbbc47b128becd431
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a5758025297844bcbbc47b128becd4312021-05-10T00:27:19ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1563-51472021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5555933A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWMReda M. S. Abdulaal0Omer A. Bafail1Departmentof Industrial EngineeringDepartmentof Industrial EngineeringWhen decision-makers’ judgments are uncertain, they often express their opinions using grey linguistic variables. Once used, the data often retains its grey nature throughout all subsequent decision-making iterations. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a tool used when making complicated decisions and in circumstances where several criteria require evaluation to choose the most desirable option. Grey data serves as the basis for several MCDM methods. This paper compares two MCDM methods, Grey-Linear-Programming (GLP) and Grey-Best-Worst-Method (GBWM), in terms of the weights of decision criteria and their rankings. Moreover, Grey-The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (GTOPSIS) was used to rank the weights of the two methods. Study findings demonstrated that GBWM requires more mathematical calculations than GLP, based on linear programming's classic simplex method. On the other hand, when GTOPSIS follows GLP, the alternative rank does not change compared to when GTOPSIS followed GBWM. For the applications used in this comparison, GLP procedure is considered simpler than GBWM procedure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555933
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reda M. S. Abdulaal
Omer A. Bafail
spellingShingle Reda M. S. Abdulaal
Omer A. Bafail
A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Reda M. S. Abdulaal
Omer A. Bafail
author_sort Reda M. S. Abdulaal
title A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
title_short A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
title_full A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
title_fullStr A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study between GLP and GBWM
title_sort comparative study between glp and gbwm
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1563-5147
publishDate 2021-01-01
description When decision-makers’ judgments are uncertain, they often express their opinions using grey linguistic variables. Once used, the data often retains its grey nature throughout all subsequent decision-making iterations. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a tool used when making complicated decisions and in circumstances where several criteria require evaluation to choose the most desirable option. Grey data serves as the basis for several MCDM methods. This paper compares two MCDM methods, Grey-Linear-Programming (GLP) and Grey-Best-Worst-Method (GBWM), in terms of the weights of decision criteria and their rankings. Moreover, Grey-The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (GTOPSIS) was used to rank the weights of the two methods. Study findings demonstrated that GBWM requires more mathematical calculations than GLP, based on linear programming's classic simplex method. On the other hand, when GTOPSIS follows GLP, the alternative rank does not change compared to when GTOPSIS followed GBWM. For the applications used in this comparison, GLP procedure is considered simpler than GBWM procedure.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5555933
work_keys_str_mv AT redamsabdulaal acomparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm
AT omerabafail acomparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm
AT redamsabdulaal comparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm
AT omerabafail comparativestudybetweenglpandgbwm
_version_ 1721453741525172224