Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification

Traditional image classification algorithms are mainly divided into unsupervised and supervised paradigms. In the first paradigm, algorithms are designed to automatically estimate the classes’ distributions in the feature space. The second paradigm depends on the knowledge of a domain expert to iden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thales Sehn Körting, Leila Maria Garcia Fonseca, Emiliano Ferreira Castejon, Laercio Massaru Namikawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/8/7580
id doaj-a564319b9e514a8790af1fe1fd752fa0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a564319b9e514a8790af1fe1fd752fa02020-11-24T20:56:57ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922014-08-01687580759110.3390/rs6087580rs6087580Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image ClassificationThales Sehn Körting0Leila Maria Garcia Fonseca1Emiliano Ferreira Castejon2Laercio Massaru Namikawa3Image Processing Division, Brazil's National Institute for Space Research, Av. dos Astronautas, 1758 São José dos Campos, BrazilImage Processing Division, Brazil's National Institute for Space Research, Av. dos Astronautas, 1758 São José dos Campos, BrazilImage Processing Division, Brazil's National Institute for Space Research, Av. dos Astronautas, 1758 São José dos Campos, BrazilImage Processing Division, Brazil's National Institute for Space Research, Av. dos Astronautas, 1758 São José dos Campos, BrazilTraditional image classification algorithms are mainly divided into unsupervised and supervised paradigms. In the first paradigm, algorithms are designed to automatically estimate the classes’ distributions in the feature space. The second paradigm depends on the knowledge of a domain expert to identify representative examples from the image to be used for estimating the classification model. Recent improvements in human-computer interaction (HCI) enable the construction of more intuitive graphic user interfaces (GUIs) to help users obtain desired results. In remote sensing image classification, GUIs still need advancements. In this work, we describe our efforts to develop an improved GUI for selecting the representative samples needed to estimate the classification model. The idea is to identify changes in the common strategies for sample selection to create a user-driven sample selection, which focuses on different views of each sample, and to help domain experts identify explicit classification rules, which is a well-established technique in geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA). We also propose the use of the well-known nearest neighbor algorithm to identify similar samples and accelerate the classification.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/8/7580image classificationsample selectionremote sensingGraphical User Interface (GUI)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thales Sehn Körting
Leila Maria Garcia Fonseca
Emiliano Ferreira Castejon
Laercio Massaru Namikawa
spellingShingle Thales Sehn Körting
Leila Maria Garcia Fonseca
Emiliano Ferreira Castejon
Laercio Massaru Namikawa
Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification
Remote Sensing
image classification
sample selection
remote sensing
Graphical User Interface (GUI)
author_facet Thales Sehn Körting
Leila Maria Garcia Fonseca
Emiliano Ferreira Castejon
Laercio Massaru Namikawa
author_sort Thales Sehn Körting
title Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification
title_short Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification
title_full Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification
title_fullStr Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification
title_full_unstemmed Improvements in Sample Selection Methods for Image Classification
title_sort improvements in sample selection methods for image classification
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Traditional image classification algorithms are mainly divided into unsupervised and supervised paradigms. In the first paradigm, algorithms are designed to automatically estimate the classes’ distributions in the feature space. The second paradigm depends on the knowledge of a domain expert to identify representative examples from the image to be used for estimating the classification model. Recent improvements in human-computer interaction (HCI) enable the construction of more intuitive graphic user interfaces (GUIs) to help users obtain desired results. In remote sensing image classification, GUIs still need advancements. In this work, we describe our efforts to develop an improved GUI for selecting the representative samples needed to estimate the classification model. The idea is to identify changes in the common strategies for sample selection to create a user-driven sample selection, which focuses on different views of each sample, and to help domain experts identify explicit classification rules, which is a well-established technique in geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA). We also propose the use of the well-known nearest neighbor algorithm to identify similar samples and accelerate the classification.
topic image classification
sample selection
remote sensing
Graphical User Interface (GUI)
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/8/7580
work_keys_str_mv AT thalessehnkorting improvementsinsampleselectionmethodsforimageclassification
AT leilamariagarciafonseca improvementsinsampleselectionmethodsforimageclassification
AT emilianoferreiracastejon improvementsinsampleselectionmethodsforimageclassification
AT laerciomassarunamikawa improvementsinsampleselectionmethodsforimageclassification
_version_ 1716789364186415104