Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns

While movement of pseudo-incorporated arguments seems to be restricted generally, there is considerable variation across languages to what extend dislocation can take place. Whereas Turkish, German, and Hindi have been shown to allow for certain movement operations, pseudo-incorporated objects in Ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Imke Driemel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-11-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1120
id doaj-a54be0823d5d42e891d1ba08b5061dee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a54be0823d5d42e891d1ba08b5061dee2021-09-02T15:13:33ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-11-015110.5334/gjgl.1120557Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patternsImke Driemel0Universität Leipzig, LeipzigWhile movement of pseudo-incorporated arguments seems to be restricted generally, there is considerable variation across languages to what extend dislocation can take place. Whereas Turkish, German, and Hindi have been shown to allow for certain movement operations, pseudo-incorporated objects in Tamil for example are argued to require surface adjacency with the verb. This paper provides new evidence against surface adjacency in Tamil. More importantly, the study points out a striking parallel between movement of pseudo-incorporated objects and the respective VP-movement patterns within Tamil, Mongolian, Turkish, and German. Pseudo-incorporated objects are argued to constitute partially verbal categories, which explains the movement patterns, along with two other trademark properties of pseudo-incorporation – lack of case marking and scope inertness.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1120pseudo-incorporationsurface adjacencyvp-movementdp/np accounts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Imke Driemel
spellingShingle Imke Driemel
Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
Glossa
pseudo-incorporation
surface adjacency
vp-movement
dp/np accounts
author_facet Imke Driemel
author_sort Imke Driemel
title Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
title_short Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
title_full Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
title_fullStr Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
title_full_unstemmed Pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
title_sort pseudo-incorporation and its movement patterns
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2020-11-01
description While movement of pseudo-incorporated arguments seems to be restricted generally, there is considerable variation across languages to what extend dislocation can take place. Whereas Turkish, German, and Hindi have been shown to allow for certain movement operations, pseudo-incorporated objects in Tamil for example are argued to require surface adjacency with the verb. This paper provides new evidence against surface adjacency in Tamil. More importantly, the study points out a striking parallel between movement of pseudo-incorporated objects and the respective VP-movement patterns within Tamil, Mongolian, Turkish, and German. Pseudo-incorporated objects are argued to constitute partially verbal categories, which explains the movement patterns, along with two other trademark properties of pseudo-incorporation – lack of case marking and scope inertness.
topic pseudo-incorporation
surface adjacency
vp-movement
dp/np accounts
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1120
work_keys_str_mv AT imkedriemel pseudoincorporationanditsmovementpatterns
_version_ 1721173929764061184