Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia

Since the exact place of Russian state and society between “the East” and “the West” has been a contested topic for ages, “Russian Orientalism” has also turned to be one of the key words in the Russia and Eurasia-related area studies. In this paper, one source of this "Orientalism" is sea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Melih Demirtaş
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cappadocia University 2020-12-01
Series:Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjas.kapadokya.edu.tr/index.php/cjas/article/view/23
id doaj-a54961e3445b464e82311c12e087c74f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a54961e3445b464e82311c12e087c74f2021-03-22T11:00:32ZengCappadocia UniversityCappadocia Journal of Area Studies2717-72542020-12-012210.38154/cjas.42Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academiaMelih Demirtaş0 Middle East Technical University Since the exact place of Russian state and society between “the East” and “the West” has been a contested topic for ages, “Russian Orientalism” has also turned to be one of the key words in the Russia and Eurasia-related area studies. In this paper, one source of this "Orientalism" is searched in the so-called “Russian exceptionalism” or “uniqueness”. Thus, first supportive arguments are tried to be found in Russian Academia in the 19th century, through which a growing impact of Orientologists led to the ideas in line with the official circles of Russian imperialism. It will be therefore argued that supported from the Academia’s works increasingly, the effect of “spatiality” appeared as “in-between status” has provided a more hegemonic and stronger Russian mentality nurtured from both similarities and/or contrasts with both Western and Eastern neighbors. One strong argument will remain however as a current evaluation: the “civilized” Russian central elites have continued to search their State’s “Orient” always within the “eastern” territories conquered, like in the Caucasus, Idel/Volga or in Central Asia (Turkestan). https://cjas.kapadokya.edu.tr/index.php/cjas/article/view/23Russian OrientalismRussian AcademiaConstructivismDichotomiesOrientologistsKazan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melih Demirtaş
spellingShingle Melih Demirtaş
Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia
Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies
Russian Orientalism
Russian Academia
Constructivism
Dichotomies
Orientologists
Kazan
author_facet Melih Demirtaş
author_sort Melih Demirtaş
title Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia
title_short Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia
title_full Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia
title_fullStr Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia
title_full_unstemmed Construction of Russian exceptionalism: first Orientologists in Russian academia
title_sort construction of russian exceptionalism: first orientologists in russian academia
publisher Cappadocia University
series Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies
issn 2717-7254
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Since the exact place of Russian state and society between “the East” and “the West” has been a contested topic for ages, “Russian Orientalism” has also turned to be one of the key words in the Russia and Eurasia-related area studies. In this paper, one source of this "Orientalism" is searched in the so-called “Russian exceptionalism” or “uniqueness”. Thus, first supportive arguments are tried to be found in Russian Academia in the 19th century, through which a growing impact of Orientologists led to the ideas in line with the official circles of Russian imperialism. It will be therefore argued that supported from the Academia’s works increasingly, the effect of “spatiality” appeared as “in-between status” has provided a more hegemonic and stronger Russian mentality nurtured from both similarities and/or contrasts with both Western and Eastern neighbors. One strong argument will remain however as a current evaluation: the “civilized” Russian central elites have continued to search their State’s “Orient” always within the “eastern” territories conquered, like in the Caucasus, Idel/Volga or in Central Asia (Turkestan).
topic Russian Orientalism
Russian Academia
Constructivism
Dichotomies
Orientologists
Kazan
url https://cjas.kapadokya.edu.tr/index.php/cjas/article/view/23
work_keys_str_mv AT melihdemirtas constructionofrussianexceptionalismfirstorientologistsinrussianacademia
_version_ 1724208832830242816