La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700

The history of the derivatio, the grammaticae rationales, and the synchrony-diachrony confusion between the XVII and the XVIII century. It is usually assumed that between the 16th and the 18th centuries language sciences included three main research lines: works on language origin; practical gramma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luca Alfieri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2019-05-01
Series:Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/asgm/article/view/11715
id doaj-a541087dec5045109327f6614f0fb0b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a541087dec5045109327f6614f0fb0b02021-08-17T09:13:49ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoAtti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese1972-99012019-05-01201813 n.s.10.13130/1972-9901/11715La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700Luca Alfieri0Università Telematica G. Marconi The history of the derivatio, the grammaticae rationales, and the synchrony-diachrony confusion between the XVII and the XVIII century. It is usually assumed that between the 16th and the 18th centuries language sciences included three main research lines: works on language origin; practical grammars and philosophical grammars. This view has been countered by Alfieri (2019), who showed that between the 13th and the 16th centuries philosophical grammars comprised two types of works which were substantially different as for their settlement on the time axis, as well as for their theory of derivatio. In this case the hypothesis in Alfieri (2019) will be taken up, showing that also in the 17th and 18th centuries philosophical grammars included two groups of works: a-chronic grammars that exclude data on word-formation; pan-chronic grammars that describe data on word-formation with special attention, but interpret these data only sub specie originis linguae.   KEYWORDS: History of linguistics, word-formation, rational grammars, philosophical grammars, synchrony and diachrony. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/asgm/article/view/11715
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luca Alfieri
spellingShingle Luca Alfieri
La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese
author_facet Luca Alfieri
author_sort Luca Alfieri
title La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
title_short La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
title_full La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
title_fullStr La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
title_full_unstemmed La storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
title_sort la storia della derivatio, le grammatiche rationales e la confusione tra le moderne nozioni di sincronia e diacronia tra il ’600 e il ’700
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese
issn 1972-9901
publishDate 2019-05-01
description The history of the derivatio, the grammaticae rationales, and the synchrony-diachrony confusion between the XVII and the XVIII century. It is usually assumed that between the 16th and the 18th centuries language sciences included three main research lines: works on language origin; practical grammars and philosophical grammars. This view has been countered by Alfieri (2019), who showed that between the 13th and the 16th centuries philosophical grammars comprised two types of works which were substantially different as for their settlement on the time axis, as well as for their theory of derivatio. In this case the hypothesis in Alfieri (2019) will be taken up, showing that also in the 17th and 18th centuries philosophical grammars included two groups of works: a-chronic grammars that exclude data on word-formation; pan-chronic grammars that describe data on word-formation with special attention, but interpret these data only sub specie originis linguae.   KEYWORDS: History of linguistics, word-formation, rational grammars, philosophical grammars, synchrony and diachrony.
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/asgm/article/view/11715
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaalfieri lastoriadelladerivatiolegrammaticherationaleselaconfusionetralemodernenozionidisincroniaediacroniatrail600eil700
_version_ 1721205243951185920